qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v12 28/28] tests/qmp-test: blacklist sev specifi


From: Daniel P. Berrange
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v12 28/28] tests/qmp-test: blacklist sev specific qmp commands
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 23:22:24 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)

On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 06:45:04PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 02:18:55PM -0600, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 3/8/18 11:08 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 06:49:01AM -0600, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> > >> Blacklist the following commands to fix the 'make check' failure.
> > >>
> > >> query-sev-launch-measure: it returns meaninful data only when we launch
> > >> SEV guest otherwise the command returns an error.
> > >>
> > >> query-sev: it return an error when SEV is not available on host (e.g non
> > >> X86 platform or KVM is disabled at the build time)
> > >>
> > >> query-sev-capabilities: it returns an error when SEV feature is not
> > >> available on host machine.
> > > We generally expect 'make check' to succeed on every single patch
> > > in a series, so that 'git bisect' doesn't break.
> > >
> > > So you should add each command to the blacklist in the same commit
> > > that introduced the failure in the first place.
> > 
> > 
> > Sure, I can quickly send the updated patch series to address your this
> > concern, but before spamming everyone's inbox I was wondering if I can
> > get some indication whether this series will make into 2.12 merge.
> > 
> > Paolo, Eduardo and Richard,
> > 
> > Most of the changes are in x86 directory hence any thought if you are
> > considering this series for 2.12 ? I have been testing the series with
> > and without SEV support and so far have not ran into any issue. if you
> > are not planning to pull this series in 2.12 then I will wait a bit
> > longer to get more feedback before sending the updates to address
> > Daniel's comment. thanks
> 
> Trying to merge it before 2.12 soft freeze (next Tuesday) still
> looks like a reasonable goal to me.  What do others think?

I've only really looked at the QAPI / QMP bits and they seem fine from
pov of libvirt's needs - just very minor comments. So not objection from
me on that area of the code.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-    http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]