[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] lock-guard: add scoped lock implementation
From: |
Stefan Hajnoczi |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] lock-guard: add scoped lock implementation |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:16:20 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) |
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 06:56:12PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 08/12/2017 16:30, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 11:55:50AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
> > The implementation is somewhat complex. Please structure the header
> > file so the public interfaces are clear and documented. Move the
> > implementation out of the way and mark it private. That will make it
> > easier for someone to figure out "how do I use lock-guard.h".
>
> Right, unfortunately you pretty much have to place it in the header to
> guarantee that everything is inlined.
Yes, that's fine. I think the important part is to put public
interfaces next to each other and document them.
> >> +#define QEMU_WITH_LOCK(type, name, lock)
> >> \
> >> + for (QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(type, name, lock);
> >> \
> >> + qemu_lock_guard_is_taken(&name);
> >> \
> >> + qemu_lock_guard_unlock(&name))
> >
> > I don't understand the need for the qemu_lock_guard_is_taken(&name)
> > condition, why not do the following?
> >
> > for (QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(type, name, lock);
> > ;
> > qemu_lock_guard_unlock(&name))
>
> Because that would be an infinite loop. :)
Sorry, I mean for (...; false; ...). Is there any reason to do
qemu_lock_guard_is_taken(&name)?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] qemu-timer: convert to use lock guards, Paolo Bonzini, 2017/12/08
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] qht: convert to use lock guards, Paolo Bonzini, 2017/12/08
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] thread-pool: convert to use lock guards, Paolo Bonzini, 2017/12/08