qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Question] why need to start all queues in vhost_net_st


From: Gonglei (Arei)
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Question] why need to start all queues in vhost_net_start
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:01:12 +0000


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Wang [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 4:55 PM
> To: longpeng; address@hidden
> Cc: Longpeng(Mike); address@hidden; Gonglei (Arei); Wangjing (King,
> Euler); Huangweidong (C); address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Question] why need to start all queues in vhost_net_start
> 
> 
> 
> On 2017年11月16日 13:53, Longpeng (Mike) wrote:
> > On 2017/11/15 23:54, Longpeng(Mike) wrote:
> >> 2017-11-15 23:05 GMT+08:00 Jason Wang<address@hidden>:
> >>> On 2017年11月15日 22:55, Longpeng(Mike) wrote:
> >>>> Hi guys,
> >>>>
> >>>> We got a BUG report from our testers yesterday, the testing scenario was
> >>>> migrating a VM (Windows guest, *4 vcpus*, 4GB, vhost-user net: *7
> >>>> queues*).
> >>>>
> >>>> We found the cause reason, and we'll report the BUG or send a fix patch
> >>>> to upstream if necessary( we haven't test the upstream yet, sorry... ).
> >>> Could you explain this a little bit more?
> >>>
> >>>> We want to know why the vhost_net_start() must start*total queues*
> ( in
> >>>> our
> >>>> VM there're 7 queues ) but not*the queues that current used*  ( in our
> VM,
> >>>> guest
> >>>> only uses the first 4 queues because it's limited by the number of vcpus)
> >>>> ?
> >>>>
> >>>> Looking forward to your help, thx:)
> >>> Since the codes have been there for years and works well for kernel
> >>> datapath. You should really explain what's wrong.
> >>>
> >> OK.:)
> >>
> >> In our scenario,  the Windows's virtio-net driver only use the first 4
> >> queues and it
> >> *only set desc/avail/used table for the first 4 queues*, so in QEMU
> >> the desc/avail/
> >> used of the last 3 queues are ZERO,  but unfortunately...
> >> '''
> >> vhost_net_start
> >>    for (i = 0; i < total_queues; i++)
> >>      vhost_net_start_one
> >>        vhost_dev_start
> >>          vhost_virtqueue_start
> >> '''
> >> In vhost_virtqueue_start(), it will calculate the HVA of
> >> desc/avail/used table, so for last
> >> 3 queues, it will use ZERO as the GPA to calculate the HVA, and then
> >> send the results
> >> to the user-mode backend ( we use*vhost-user*  ) by
> vhost_virtqueue_set_addr().
> >>
> >> When the EVS get these address, it will update a*idx*  which will be
> >> treated as  vq's
> >> last_avail_idx when virtio-net stop ( pls see vhost_virtqueue_stop() ).
> >>
> >> So we get the following result after virtio-net stop:
> >>    the desc/avail/used of the last 3 queues's vqs are all ZERO, but these
> vqs's
> >>    last_avail_idx is NOT ZERO.
> >>
> >> At last, virtio_load() reports an error:
> >> '''
> >>    if (!vdev->vq[i].vring.desc && vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx) { // <--
> >> will be TRUE
> >>        error_report("VQ %d address 0x0 "
> >>                           "inconsistent with Host index 0x%x",
> >>                           i, vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx);
> >>              return -1;
> >>     }
> >> '''
> >>
> >> BTW, the problem won't appear if use Linux guest, because the Linux
> virtio-net
> >> driver will set all 7 queues's desc/avail/used tables. And the problem
> >> won't appear
> >> if the VM use vhost-net, because vhost-net won't update*idx*  in
> SET_ADDR ioctl.
> 
> Just to make sure I understand here, I thought Windows guest + vhost_net
> hit this issue?
> 
No, Windows guest + vhost-user/DPDK.

BTW pls see virtio spec in :

"If VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ is negotiated, each of receiveq1. . .receiveqN that will be 
used SHOULD be populated
with receive buffers."

It is not mandatory that all queues must be initialized.

Thanks,
-Gonglei


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]