|
From: | Dou Liyang |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 2/4] hw/acpi-build: Make assignment statement of next_base easy to read |
Date: | Tue, 10 Oct 2017 10:34:54 +0800 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 |
Hi Eduardo, At 10/10/2017 10:29 AM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 10:10:03AM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:It may be hard to read the assignment statement of "next_base", so S/next_base += (1ULL << 32) - pcms->below_4g_mem_size; /next_base = mem_base + mem_len; ... for readability. No functionality change. Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <address@hidden>This or the new test case at patch 3/4 seem to have caused build failures under some circumstances: https://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg486368.html I couldn't reproduce the failure yet, but I'm removing this and patch 3/4 from the queue until this is investigated.
Hmm, I see, I will do it. Thanks, dou.
--- hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c index a0cf3bf..48525a1 100644 --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c @@ -2411,7 +2411,7 @@ build_srat(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, MachineState *machine) } mem_base = 1ULL << 32; mem_len = next_base - pcms->below_4g_mem_size; - next_base += (1ULL << 32) - pcms->below_4g_mem_size; + next_base = mem_base + mem_len; } numamem = acpi_data_push(table_data, sizeof *numamem); build_srat_memory(numamem, mem_base, mem_len, i - 1, -- 2.5.5
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |