Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] backup improvements part 1

[Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy]

02.10.2017 18:38, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/02/2017 09:39 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> > Hi all. Here is a continuation of my "new backup architecture" series,
> > The very first part, but it is meaningful itself.
> >
> > 01: was previously sent in other my series, but here is more correct
> >      version, one mistake is fixed.
> > 02: only rebased to new byte-based interfaces (by Eric), r-bs saved
> Presumably, that means we need to tell patchew:
>
> Based-on:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-09/msg06848.html
> [PATCH v10 00/20] make dirty-bitmap byte-based

Yes, surely, I forgot to note it.

> > 03: changed to use hbitmap_next_zero, also a comment added to
> >      none-mode (Fam)
> > 04: commit message rewritten. The patch was controversial, but I need
> >      it for further backup enhancement, so, let's continue the
> >      discussion.
> > 05: rebased, logic is not changed, r-bs saved
> >
> >
> > Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (5):
> >    hbitmap: add next_zero function
> >    backup: move from done_bitmap to copy_bitmap
> >    backup: init copy_bitmap from sync_bitmap for incremental
> >    backup: simplify non-dirty bits progress processing
> >    backup: use copy_bitmap in incremental backup
> >
> >   include/block/dirty-bitmap.h |   1 +
> >   include/qemu/hbitmap.h       |   8 +++
> >   block/backup.c               | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> >   block/dirty-bitmap.c         |   5 ++
> >   util/hbitmap.c               |  29 +++++++++++
> >   5 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)


--
Best regards,
Vladimir