qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v19 0/2] virtio-crypto: virtio


From: Longpeng (Mike)
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v19 0/2] virtio-crypto: virtio crypto device specification
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 12:17:03 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1


On 2017/9/6 21:52, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 01:45:45PM +0200, Halil Pasic wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/01/2017 02:47 AM, Longpeng (Mike) wrote:
>>> Ping...
>>>
>>> Stefan, Halil, do you have any suggestion ?
>>>
>>
>> Hi Longpeng,
>>
>> I've ran trough your patch, and it reads much better that
>> what I recall v18 used to read like. Because it's been a while
>> since v18 doing a conscious review on this will take a considerable
>> amount of time (my memories of the issues identified back then
>> are very sketchy/vague now). It's on my todo list, but it ain't the
>> only item there.

> 
> I don't think it's a fair reason to delay the merging though.
> No comments in a while says time to merge to me.
> There's always a public review period during which more comments
> can be addressed.
> 
> So I think we should start a ballot on this one.
> Mike - if you agree please open an issue in TC issue
> tracker.  As a reminder here are the guidelines:
> 


Hi Michael,

I've promised Halil to send an implementation based on the v19 this week and I
can complete it in this two days, OTOH, Halil had give some very useful
suggestions on the v18 and we also hope him could closely review the v19 spec.

So I suggest to give Halil enough time(one more week?) to review the v19 if he 
will.

If everything is ok, we could start a ballot on this one(if no other
suggestions) or the v20(update according with the new suggestions).

-- 
Regards,
Longpeng(Mike)

> 
> --
> 
> When you open an issue (can be fixed afterwards as well):
> 
> 1. Fill in the reporter in the Environment: field.
> 2. Shortly describe the issue in the description field
>    Preferably add a URL to discussion here or
>    in the comments.
>    If the mail was copied to virtio-comment or virtio-dev, you can use
>         mid.gmane.org/<message-id>
>    to quickly locate a mail in the archives.
> 2. Preferably, fill in all affected versions: in
>    "Affects Version/s:".
>    This might not apply to e.g. improvement requests.
> 
> ---
> 
> When you propose the issue before the TC meeting:
> 
> 1. Mark issue as Open
> 2. Fill in a summary of the final proposed change and
>    link to full proposal in "Proposal"
>    field.
>    [any historical abandoned proposals and extra info can go
>     into comments field]
> ---
> 
> Then mail me and the TC and I will start a ballot.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
>> Btw. I like to have a reference implementation at hand when reviewing
>> a spec. What is the status of the (reference) implementation (I mean
>> the new stuff like stateless/mux)? I think it would be nice to provide
>> this info in the cover letter (e.g. next time, should we need another
>> iteration).
>>
>> Regards,
>> Halil
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: address@hidden
>> For additional commands, e-mail: address@hidden
> 
> .
> 


-- 
Regards,
Longpeng(Mike)




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]