qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 1/1] ppc: spapr: Move VCPU ID calcula


From: Sam Bobroff
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 1/1] ppc: spapr: Move VCPU ID calculation into sPAPR
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 09:31:47 +1000
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)

On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 12:18:57PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 16:38:46 +1000
> Sam Bobroff <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > Move the calculation of a CPU's VCPU ID out of the generic PPC code
> > (ppc_cpu_realizefn()) and into sPAPR specific code
> > (spapr_cpu_core_realize()) where it belongs.
> > 
> > Unfortunately, due to the way things are ordered, we still need to
> > default the VCPU ID in ppc_cpu_realizfn() but at least doing that
> > doesn't require any interaction with sPAPR.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > This is follow up work arising from my work to clean up the way CPU VCPU 
> > IDs are
> > handled on PowerPC. It had looked like it would be difficult to move the 
> > actual
> > VCPU ID calculation out of generic code but it turned out to be OK.
> > 
> > It's based on dgibson/ppc-for-2.11.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Sam.
> > 
> >  hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c     | 11 +++++++++++
> >  target/ppc/translate_init.c | 18 +++---------------
> >  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> > index 5e319d9bbb..84dcc6e264 100644
> > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> > @@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ error:
> >  
> >  static void spapr_cpu_core_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> >  {
> > +    sPAPRMachineState *spapr = SPAPR_MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
> >      sPAPRCPUCore *sc = SPAPR_CPU_CORE(OBJECT(dev));
> >      sPAPRCPUCoreClass *scc = SPAPR_CPU_CORE_GET_CLASS(OBJECT(dev));
> >      CPUCore *cc = CPU_CORE(OBJECT(dev));
> > @@ -237,6 +238,16 @@ static void spapr_cpu_core_realize(DeviceState *dev, 
> > Error **errp)
> >          cs = CPU(obj);
> >          cpu = POWERPC_CPU(cs);
> >          cs->cpu_index = cc->core_id + i;
> > +        cpu->vcpu_id = (cc->core_id * spapr->vsmt / smp_threads) + i;
> 
> According to what we currently have in the generic code, this should be:
> 
> ((cc->core_id + i) / smp_threads) * spapr->vsmt + ((cc->core_id + i) % 
> smp_threads)
> 
> but since cc->core_id is a multiple of smp_threads and i < cc->nr_threads <= 
> smp_threads,
> then we can indeed simplify the computation as you did. :)
> 
> \o/
> 
> Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <address@hidden>

Thanks for the review, and the nice simplification was David's idea :-)

> > +        if (kvm_enabled() && !kvm_vcpu_id_is_valid(cpu->vcpu_id)) {
> > +            error_setg(&local_err, "Can't create CPU with id %d in KVM",
> > +                       cpu->vcpu_id);
> > +            error_append_hint(&local_err, "Adjust the number of cpus to %d 
> > "
> > +                              "or try to raise the number of threads per 
> > core\n",
> > +                              cpu->vcpu_id * smp_threads / spapr->vsmt);
> > +            goto err;
> > +        }
> > +
> >  
> >          /* Set NUMA node for the threads belonged to core  */
> >          cpu->node_id = sc->node_id;
> > diff --git a/target/ppc/translate_init.c b/target/ppc/translate_init.c
> > index 7f6a349e43..1f7286c893 100644
> > --- a/target/ppc/translate_init.c
> > +++ b/target/ppc/translate_init.c
> > @@ -9903,28 +9903,15 @@ static void ppc_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, 
> > Error **errp)
> >      PowerPCCPU *cpu = POWERPC_CPU(dev);
> >      PowerPCCPUClass *pcc = POWERPC_CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
> >      Error *local_err = NULL;
> > -#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> > -    int max_smt = kvmppc_smt_threads();
> > -#endif
> >  
> >      cpu_exec_realizefn(cs, &local_err);
> >      if (local_err != NULL) {
> >          error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> >          return;
> >      }
> > -
> > -#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> > -    cpu->vcpu_id = (cs->cpu_index / smp_threads) * max_smt
> > -        + (cs->cpu_index % smp_threads);
> > -
> > -    if (kvm_enabled() && !kvm_vcpu_id_is_valid(cpu->vcpu_id)) {
> > -        error_setg(errp, "Can't create CPU with id %d in KVM", 
> > cpu->vcpu_id);
> > -        error_append_hint(errp, "Adjust the number of cpus to %d "
> > -                          "or try to raise the number of threads per 
> > core\n",
> > -                          cpu->vcpu_id * smp_threads / max_smt);
> > -        goto unrealize;
> > +    if (cpu->vcpu_id == UNASSIGNED_CPU_INDEX) {
> > +        cpu->vcpu_id = cs->cpu_index;
> >      }
> > -#endif
> >  
> >      if (tcg_enabled()) {
> >          if (ppc_fixup_cpu(cpu) != 0) {
> > @@ -10625,6 +10612,7 @@ static void ppc_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
> >      CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
> >  
> >      cs->env_ptr = env;
> > +    cpu->vcpu_id = UNASSIGNED_CPU_INDEX;
> >  
> >      env->msr_mask = pcc->msr_mask;
> >      env->mmu_model = pcc->mmu_model;
> 





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]