qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 02/04] colo-compare: Processpactkets in the I


From: wang.yong155
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 02/04] colo-compare: Processpactkets in the IOThreadofthe primary
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 09:02:59 +0800 (CST)

>On 24/07/2017 12:38, address@hidden wrote:

>> finally use g_main_loop_run to replace aio_poll  in the

>> iothread_run function.

>

>That would make the performance of virtio-blk with iothreads worse,

>unfortunately.  aio_poll is much more optimized than g_main_loop_run.

Hi Paolo,

Any other good idea to achieve this?




Thanks




>

>Paolo

>

>> After that IOThread

>> runs the GMainContext event loop,chardev and IOThread can work together.

>> 

>> How about it? If feasible, I will try to submit 












原始邮件



发件人: <address@hidden>
收件人:王勇10170530 <address@hidden> <address@hidden> <address@hidden>
抄送人: <address@hidden> <address@hidden> <address@hidden> 
<address@hidden>王广10165992
日 期 :2017年07月24日 19:59
主 题 :Re: [PATCHv2 02/04] colo-compare: Processpactkets in the IOThreadofthe 
primary





On 24/07/2017 12:38, address@hidden wrote:
> finally use g_main_loop_run to replace aio_poll  in the
> iothread_run function.

That would make the performance of virtio-blk with iothreads worse,
unfortunately.  aio_poll is much more optimized than g_main_loop_run.

Paolo

> After that IOThread
> runs the GMainContext event loop,chardev and IOThread can work together.
> 
> How about it? If feasible, I will try to submit a patch.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]