qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] qemu.py: fix is_running()


From: Lukáš Doktor
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] qemu.py: fix is_running()
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 09:34:37 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1

Dne 20.7.2017 v 22:14 Amador Pahim napsal(a):
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 7:49 PM, Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 05:09:11PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> Amador Pahim <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Markus Armbruster <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>> Amador Pahim <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Current implementation is broken. It does not really test if the child
>>>>>> process is running.
>>>>>
>>>>> What usage exactly is broken by this?  Got a reproducer for me?
>>>>
>>>> Problem is that 'returncode' is not set without a calling
>>>> poll()/wait()/communicate(), so it's only useful to test if the
>>>> process is running after such calls. But if we use 'poll()' instead,
>>>> it will, according to the docs, "Check if child process has
>>>> terminated. Set and return returncode attribute."
>>>>
>>>> Reproducer is:
>>>>
>>>>  >>> import subprocess
>>>>  >>> devnull = open('/dev/null', 'rb')
>>>>  >>> p = subprocess.Popen(['qemu-system-x86_64', '-broken'],
>>>> stdin=devnull, stdout=devnull, stderr=devnull, shell=False)
>>>>  >>> print p.returncode
>>>>  None
>>>>  >>> print p.poll()
>>>>  1
>>>>  >>> print p.returncode
>>>>  1
>>>>
>>>>>> The Popen.returncode will only be set after by a poll(), wait() or
>>>>>> communicate(). If the Popen fails to launch a VM, the Popen.returncode
>>>>>> will not turn to None by itself.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm.  What is the value of .returncode then?
>>>>
>>>> returncode starts with None and becomes the process exit code when the
>>>> process is over and one of that three methods is called (poll(),
>>>> wait() or communicate()).
>>>>
>>>> There's an error in my description though. The correct would be: "The
>>>> Popen.returncode will only be set after a call to poll(), wait() or
>>>> communicate(). If the Popen fails to launch a VM, the Popen.returncode
>>>> will not turn from None to the actual return code by itself."
>>>
>>> Suggest to add ", and is_running() continues to report True".
>>>
>>>>>> Instead of using Popen.returncode, let's use Popen.poll(), which
>>>>>> actually checks if child process has terminated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Amador Pahim <address@hidden>
>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden>
>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <address@hidden>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>  scripts/qemu.py | 2 +-
>>>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/scripts/qemu.py b/scripts/qemu.py
>>>>>> index 880e3e8219..f0fade32bd 100644
>>>>>> --- a/scripts/qemu.py
>>>>>> +++ b/scripts/qemu.py
>>>>>> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ class QEMUMachine(object):
>>>>>>              raise
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      def is_running(self):
>>>>>> -        return self._popen and (self._popen.returncode is None)
>>>>>> +        return self._popen and (self._popen.poll() is None)
>>>>>>
>>
>> After re-reading shutdown(), I think this is _not_ OK: if
>> is_running() return False before we call .wait(), we will never
>> load the log file or run _post_shutdown() if QEMU exits between
>> the launch() and shutdown() calls.
> 
> Yes, I just noticed that while cleaning up the code.
> 
>>
>> Yes, it's fragile.
>>
>> The root problem on both launch() and shutdown() seems to be
>> coupling the external "is QEMU running?" state with the internal
>> "did we load the log file and ran _post_shutdown() already?"
>> state.
>>
>> I see two possible approaches for this:
>>
>> 1) Benefit from the fact that the internal Popen state will not
>>    change under our feet unless we explicitly call
>>    poll()/wait()/etc, and keep the existing code.  (Not my
>>    favorite option)
>>
>> 2) Rewrite the code so that we don't depend on the subtle Popen
>>    internal state rules, and track our own internal state in
>>    a QEMUMachine attribute.  e.g.:
> 
> +1 for this approach. I'm working on something similar, thanks for the
> detailed "e.g." code here.
> 
>>
>>     def _handle_shutdown(self):
>>         '''Load log file and call _post_shutdown() hook if necessary'''
>>         # Must be called only after QEMU actually exited.
>>         assert not self.is_running()
>>         if self._shutdown_pending:
>>             if self.exitcode() < 0:
>>                 sys.stderr.write('qemu received signal %i: %s\n' % 
>> (-exitcode, ' '.join(self._args)))
>>             self._load_io_log()
>>             self._post_shutdown()
>>             self._shutdown_pending = False
>>
>>     def _terminate(self):
>>         '''Terminate QEMU if it's still running'''
>>         if self.is_running():
>>             try:
>>                 self._qmp.cmd('quit')
>>                 self._qmp.close()
>>             except:
>>                 self._popen.kill()
>>                 self._popen.wait()
>>
>>     def _launch(self):
>>         '''Launch the VM and establish a QMP connection'''
>>         devnull = open('/dev/null', 'rb')
>>         qemulog = open(self._qemu_log_path, 'wb')
>>         self._shutdown_pending = True
>>         self._pre_launch()
>>         args = self._wrapper + [self._binary] + self._base_args() + 
>> self._args
>>         self._popen = subprocess.Popen(args, stdin=devnull, stdout=qemulog,
>>                                        stderr=subprocess.STDOUT, shell=False)
>>         self._post_launch()
>>
>>     def launch(self):
>>         try:
>>             self._launch()
>>         except:
>>             self._terminate()
>>             self._handle_shutdown()
>>             raise
>>
>>     def shutdown(self):
>>         '''Terminate the VM and clean up'''
>>         self._terminate()
>>         self._handle_shutdown()
>>
This part also caught my attention and I also meant to improve it when this 
series is merged. Anyway let's state my suggestions here, take it or let it go:

1. `get_log` should check whether `self._iolog` is `None` and then it should 
check for process status
2. the `self._iolog` is `None` is the indication whether `shutdown` was called 
or not (not whether the process exists or not)
3. add `__del__` to cleanup in case one forgets to call `shutdown` (currently 
the files and processes are left behind)
4. use `name = "qemu-%d-%d" % (os.getpid(), id(self))` to allow multiple 
instances with default name at the same time.


Also I just realized that even with just this patch (as is) files/processes can 
be left behind:

    >>> import qemu, os
    >>> a=qemu.QEMUMachine("/usr/bin/qemu-kvm", debug=True)
    >>> a.launch()
    QMP:>>> {'execute': 'qmp_capabilities'}
    QMP:<<< {u'return': {}}
    >>> a.is_running()
    False
    >>> a.shutdown()
    >>> os.path.exists(a._qemu_log_path)
    True

Before this patch it worked well as (as Eduardo mentioned) the `is_running` was 
tracing internal state, not the process state.

Regards,
Lukáš

>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden>
>>
>>>>>>      def exitcode(self):
>>>>>>          if self._popen is None:
>>>>>                return None
>>>>>            return self._popen.returncode
>>>>>
>>>>> Why is this one safe?
>>>>
>>>> Here it's used just to retrieve the value from the Popen.returncode.
>>>> It's not being used to check whether the process is running or not.
>>>
>>> If self._popen is not None, we return self._popen.returncode.  It's None
>>> if .poll() etc. haven't been called.  Can this happen?  If not, why not?
>>> If yes, why is returning None then okay?
>>
>> It can't happen because the only caller of exitcode()
>> (device-crash-test) calls it immediately after shutdown().  But
>> it would be nice to make exitcode() behavior consistent with
>> is_running().
>>
>> --
>> Eduardo


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]