[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Status and RFC of patchew testings on QEMU
From: |
Thomas Huth |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Status and RFC of patchew testings on QEMU |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jul 2017 11:41:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0 |
On 17.07.2017 08:35, Fam Zheng wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today I've included a fourth type of the automatic patchew replies: FreeBSD.
>
> So far we have these tests running by patchew on each patch series:
>
> * Docker tests
> Basically it is
> make address@hidden \
> address@hidden \
> address@hidden"
>
> * checkpatch.pl
> Each patch is fed to ./scripts/checkpatch.pl and all errors are reported.
>
> * s390x
> It runs on a machine shared by Fedora team, basically only "./configure
> and
> make", because "make check" hanging is tricky to deal with from an
> automation perspective. (Ideas?)
Is there any check that could hang "forever"? I think most of the checks
should have a proper timeout of one or two minutes, don't they?
Maybe you could also simply run the "make check" with the "timeout"
command to avoid that it hangs forever?
> * FreeBSD
> Like s390x.
>
> Q1: In the worst case, you get four individual auto replies from patchew. Is
> that too many? Do you prefer one reply with all the results concatenated into
> one?
One result would be nicer, I think.
> Q2: Some think the full log in the mail body is more than necessary. Is it
> better or worse if it is a "tail -n 200" of the log in the body and the full
> log
> attached?
>
> Q3: What other tests do maintainers want? Different hosts? Different configure
> combinations?
Not sure, but should we maybe also check compiling with the configure
switches set to non-default values? E.g. --enable-debug --disable-slirp
--enable-tcg-interpreter --disable-tcg etc. ?
Thomas
- [Qemu-devel] Status and RFC of patchew testings on QEMU, Fam Zheng, 2017/07/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Status and RFC of patchew testings on QEMU, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2017/07/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Status and RFC of patchew testings on QEMU, Peter Maydell, 2017/07/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Status and RFC of patchew testings on QEMU, Fam Zheng, 2017/07/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Status and RFC of patchew testings on QEMU, Peter Maydell, 2017/07/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Status and RFC of patchew testings on QEMU, Daniel P. Berrange, 2017/07/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Status and RFC of patchew testings on QEMU, Peter Maydell, 2017/07/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Status and RFC of patchew testings on QEMU, Fam Zheng, 2017/07/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Status and RFC of patchew testings on QEMU, Gerd Hoffmann, 2017/07/27
Re: [Qemu-devel] Status and RFC of patchew testings on QEMU, Daniel P. Berrange, 2017/07/17
Re: [Qemu-devel] Status and RFC of patchew testings on QEMU,
Thomas Huth <=
Re: [Qemu-devel] Status and RFC of patchew testings on QEMU, Fam Zheng, 2017/07/17
Re: [Qemu-devel] Status and RFC of patchew testings on QEMU, Daniel P. Berrange, 2017/07/17