Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 06/20] virtio-blk: Convert to DEFINE_PROP_LINK

[Fam Zheng]

On Thu, 07/13 15:42, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 04/07/2017 08:43, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  hw/block/dataplane/virtio-blk.c | 2 +-
> >  hw/block/virtio-blk.c           | 5 +----
> >  hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c           | 2 --
> >  hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c          | 2 --
> >  include/hw/virtio/virtio-blk.h  | 3 ++-
> >  5 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/block/dataplane/virtio-blk.c 
> > b/hw/block/dataplane/virtio-blk.c
> > index 5556f0e..6fdc6f6 100644
> > --- a/hw/block/dataplane/virtio-blk.c
> > +++ b/hw/block/dataplane/virtio-blk.c
> > @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ void virtio_blk_data_plane_create(VirtIODevice *vdev, 
> > VirtIOBlkConf *conf,
> >      s->conf = conf;
> >  
> >      if (conf->iothread) {
> > -        s->iothread = conf->iothread;
> > +        s->iothread = IOTHREAD(conf->iothread);
> >          object_ref(OBJECT(s->iothread));
> >          s->ctx = iothread_get_aio_context(s->iothread);
> >      } else {
> > diff --git a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
> > index c0bd247..8146306 100644
> > --- a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
> > +++ b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
> > @@ -983,10 +983,6 @@ static void virtio_blk_instance_init(Object *obj)
> >  {
> >      VirtIOBlock *s = VIRTIO_BLK(obj);
> >  
> > -    object_property_add_link(obj, "iothread", TYPE_IOTHREAD,
> > -                             (Object **)&s->conf.iothread,
> > -                             qdev_prop_allow_set_link_before_realize,
> > -                             OBJ_PROP_LINK_UNREF_ON_RELEASE, NULL);
> >      device_add_bootindex_property(obj, &s->conf.conf.bootindex,
> >                                    "bootindex", "/address@hidden,0",
> >                                    DEVICE(obj), NULL);
> > @@ -1014,6 +1010,7 @@ static Property virtio_blk_properties[] = {
> >      DEFINE_PROP_BIT("request-merging", VirtIOBlock, conf.request_merging, 
> > 0,
> >                      true),
> >      DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("num-queues", VirtIOBlock, conf.num_queues, 1),
> > +    DEFINE_PROP_LINK("iothread", VirtIOBlock, conf.iothread, 
> > TYPE_IOTHREAD),
> >      DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> >  };
> >  
> > diff --git a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
> > index 90d37cb..a17ce84 100644
> > --- a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
> > +++ b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
> > @@ -789,8 +789,6 @@ static void virtio_ccw_blk_instance_init(Object *obj)
> >  
> >      virtio_instance_init_common(obj, &dev->vdev, sizeof(dev->vdev),
> >                                  TYPE_VIRTIO_BLK);
> > -    object_property_add_alias(obj, "iothread", 
> > OBJECT(&dev->vdev),"iothread",
> > -                              &error_abort);
> >      object_property_add_alias(obj, "bootindex", OBJECT(&dev->vdev),
> >                                "bootindex", &error_abort);
> >  }
> > diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> > index 301920e..984baf8 100644
> > --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> > +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> > @@ -1996,8 +1996,6 @@ static void virtio_blk_pci_instance_init(Object *obj)
> >  
> >      virtio_instance_init_common(obj, &dev->vdev, sizeof(dev->vdev),
> >                                  TYPE_VIRTIO_BLK);
> > -    object_property_add_alias(obj, "iothread", 
> > OBJECT(&dev->vdev),"iothread",
> > -                              &error_abort);
> >      object_property_add_alias(obj, "bootindex", OBJECT(&dev->vdev),
> >                                "bootindex", &error_abort);
> >  }
> > diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio-blk.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio-blk.h
> > index d3c8a6f..2452074 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio-blk.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio-blk.h
> > @@ -33,7 +33,8 @@ struct virtio_blk_inhdr
> >  struct VirtIOBlkConf
> >  {
> >      BlockConf conf;
> > -    IOThread *iothread;
> > +    /* IOThread pointer to be filled by link property */
> > +    Object *iothread;
> 
> Is this necessary?  Can we instead add a type argument to the
> DEFINE_PROP_LINK macro, or just cast something to void*?
> 
> I understand this means the series risks missing 2.10 (but I can send a
> second pull request just for it tomorrow too).

OK, will send v4 today.

Fam