qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] doc: update TYPE_MIGRATION documents


From: Peter Xu
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] doc: update TYPE_MIGRATION documents
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 16:13:27 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 10:04:01AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Peter Xu <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > [Peter collected Eduardo's patch comment and formatted into patch]
> >
> > Suggested-by: Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden>
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  migration/migration.c | 15 +++++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/migration/migration.c b/migration/migration.c
> > index dbdc121..6c64b99 100644
> > --- a/migration/migration.c
> > +++ b/migration/migration.c
> > @@ -2052,12 +2052,15 @@ static void migration_instance_init(Object *obj)
> >  static const TypeInfo migration_type = {
> >      .name = TYPE_MIGRATION,
> >      /*
> > -     * NOTE: "migration" itself is not really a device. We used
> > -     * TYPE_DEVICE here only to leverage some existing QDev features
> > -     * like "-global" properties, and HW_COMPAT_* fields (which are
> > -     * finally applied as global properties as well). If one day the
> > -     * global property feature can be migrated from QDev to QObject in
> > -     * general, then we can switch to QObject as well.
> > +     * NOTE:
> > +     *
> > +     * TYPE_MIGRATION is not really a device, as the object is not
> > +     * created using qdev_create(), it is not attached to the qdev
> > +     * device tree, and it is never realized.
> > +     *
> > +     * If one day we allow non-device QOM objects to use the global
> > +     * property system, we can switch this from TYPE_DEVICE to
> > +     * TYPE_OBJECT.
> 
> Suggest to turn this paragraph into a TODO:
> 
>         * TODO Make this TYPE_OBJECT once QOM provides something like
>         * TYPE_DEVICE's "-global" properties.

Sure. Will modify in next version. Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]