[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 6/8] VFIO: do pasid table binding
From: |
Liu, Yi L |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 6/8] VFIO: do pasid table binding |
Date: |
Thu, 11 May 2017 18:29:56 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 03:55:20PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>
>
> On 04/26/2017 06:12 PM, Liu, Yi L wrote:
> >From: "Liu, Yi L" <address@hidden>
> >
> >This patch adds IOCTL processing in vfio_iommu_type1 for
> >VFIO_IOMMU_SVM_BIND_TASK. Binds the PASID table bind by
> >calling iommu_ops->bind_pasid_table to link the whole
> >PASID table to pIOMMU.
> >
> >For VT-d, it is linking the guest PASID table to host pIOMMU.
> >This is key point to support SVM virtualization on VT-d.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Liu, Yi L <address@hidden>
> >---
> > drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 72
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> >b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> >index b3cc33f..30b6d48 100644
> >--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> >+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> >@@ -1512,6 +1512,50 @@ static int vfio_domains_have_iommu_cache(struct
> >vfio_iommu *iommu)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >+struct vfio_svm_task {
> >+ struct iommu_domain *domain;
> >+ void *payload;
> >+};
> >+
> >+static int bind_pasid_tbl_fn(struct device *dev, void *data)
> >+{
> >+ int ret = 0;
> >+ struct vfio_svm_task *task = data;
> >+ struct pasid_table_info *pasidt_binfo;
> >+
> >+ pasidt_binfo = task->payload;
> >+ ret = iommu_bind_pasid_table(task->domain, dev, pasidt_binfo);
> >+ return ret;
> >+}
> >+
> >+static int vfio_do_svm_task(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, void *data,
> >+ int (*fn)(struct device *, void *))
> >+{
> >+ int ret = 0;
> >+ struct vfio_domain *d;
> >+ struct vfio_group *g;
> >+ struct vfio_svm_task task;
> >+
> >+ task.payload = data;
> >+
> >+ mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
> >+
> >+ list_for_each_entry(d, &iommu->domain_list, next) {
> >+ list_for_each_entry(g, &d->group_list, next) {
> >+ if (g->iommu_group != NULL) {
> >+ task.domain = d->domain;
> >+ ret = iommu_group_for_each_dev(
> >+ g->iommu_group, &task, fn);
> >+ if (ret != 0)
> >+ break;
> >+ }
> >+ }
> >+ }
> >+
> >+ mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> >+ return ret;
> >+}
> >+
> > static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
> > unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> > {
> >@@ -1582,6 +1626,34 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
> > return copy_to_user((void __user *)arg, &unmap, minsz) ?
> > -EFAULT : 0;
> >+ } else if (cmd == VFIO_IOMMU_SVM_BIND_TASK) {
> >+ struct vfio_device_svm hdr;
> >+ u8 *data = NULL;
> >+ int ret = 0;
> >+
> >+ minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_device_svm, length);
> >+ if (copy_from_user(&hdr, (void __user *)arg, minsz))
> >+ return -EFAULT;
> >+
> >+ if (hdr.length == 0)
> >+ return -EINVAL;
> >+
> >+ data = memdup_user((void __user *)(arg + minsz),
> >+ hdr.length);
>
> You should check the @length is at least sizeof(struct pasid_table_info) as
> kernel uses it as pasid_table_info, a evil application can crash kernel.
Yes, thx for the remind.
Thanks,
Yi L