qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] cpu_io_recompile, icount, and re-issued instructions


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] cpu_io_recompile, icount, and re-issued instructions
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 09:59:03 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0


On 01/05/2017 03:57, Michael Eager wrote:
> 
> 
> I'm seeing incorrect values when there is a write to a memory-mapped I/O
> device when icount is set.  What I see happening is that a TB with ~20
> instructions is executed which contains a write to the MM I/O address. 
> When it gets to the io_write routine, can_do_io is false, which results
> in a call to cpu_io_recompile.
> 
> cpu_io_recompile does what it (sort of) says it is supposed to do: it
> builds a new TB with the I/O instruction as the last instruction in the
> block, then re-issues the TB.  The problem is that the new TB contains
> the instructions before the I/O instruction, so they are executed a
> second time.

They shouldn't.  When called from cpu_io_recompile,
cpu_restore_state_from_tb should compute the I/O instruction's target PC
from the host PC (stored in retaddr).

Then what happens is the following:

- cpu_io_recompile generates a new TB ending with the I/O instruction.
This new TB has a hash table conflict with the old TB (same
PC/cs_base/flags) the old TB is implicitly removed

- cpu_io_recompile calls cpu_loop_exit_noexc, which goes back to the
execution loop with updated PC

- because the PC is different, a new TB is looked up for the I/O
instruction's PC.  The TB probably is not there and translation starts
again, this time at the I/O instruction

- the new TB, when executed, causes cpu_io_recompile to fire again.
This is the inefficient part mentioned in cpu_io_recompile

- cpu_io_recompile now compiles a one-instruction TB and goes back to
the execution loop

- finally the execution loop executes the one-instruction TB for the I/O
instruction, then it can go on

Thanks,

Paolo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]