Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/14] cg3: remove unused width and height variables

[Mark Cave-Ayland]

On 15/04/17 11:54, Richard Henderson wrote:

> On 04/05/2017 01:35 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>> These aren't required since we can use the display width and height
>> directly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  hw/display/cg3.c |   15 ++++++---------
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/display/cg3.c b/hw/display/cg3.c
>> index b42f60e..178a6dd 100644
>> --- a/hw/display/cg3.c
>> +++ b/hw/display/cg3.c
>> @@ -93,14 +93,11 @@ static void cg3_update_display(void *opaque)
>>      uint32_t *data;
>>      uint32_t dval;
>>      int x, y, y_start;
>> -    unsigned int width, height;
>>      ram_addr_t page, page_min, page_max;
>>
>>      if (surface_bits_per_pixel(surface) != 32) {
>>          return;
>>      }
>> -    width = s->width;
>> -    height = s->height;
>>
>>      y_start = -1;
>>      page_min = -1;
>> @@ -110,11 +107,11 @@ static void cg3_update_display(void *opaque)
>>      data = (uint32_t *)surface_data(surface);
>>
>>      memory_region_sync_dirty_bitmap(&s->vram_mem);
>> -    for (y = 0; y < height; y++) {
>> +    for (y = 0; y < s->height; y++) {
> 
> I suspect the generated code is much worse, since the compiler can no
> longer tell that the loop bounds are constant.
> 
> You probably do want to keep width and height in local variables across
> this function.

Can you explain a bit more about this? My thoughts were that with
optimisation enabled the compiler would assume s->width is constant
throughout the loop by default (or at least in OpenBIOS I've had to
explicitly mark variables as volatile to ensure the compiler refetches
the original value instead of reusing a previous copy from the
stack/registers)?


ATB,

Mark.