qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-blk: add DISCARD support to virtio-blk d


From: Stefan Hajnoczi
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-blk: add DISCARD support to virtio-blk driver
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 21:20:18 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23)

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 04:39:25PM +0800, Changpeng Liu wrote:
> Currently virtio-blk driver does not provide discard feature flag, so the
> filesystems which built on top of the block device will not send discard
> command. This is okay for HDD backend, but it will impact the performance
> for SSD backend.
> 
> Add a feature flag VIRTIO_BLK_F_DISCARD and command VIRTIO_BLK_T_DISCARD
> to extend exist virtio-blk protocol. virtio-blk protocol uses a single
> 8 bytes descriptor containing type,reserved and sector, currently Linux
> uses the reserved field as IO priority, here we also re-use the reserved
> field as number of discard sectors.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Changpeng Liu <address@hidden>
> ---
>  drivers/block/virtio_blk.c      | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  include/uapi/linux/virtio_blk.h | 12 ++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> index 1d4c9f8..550cfe7 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> @@ -241,6 +241,9 @@ static int virtio_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>       case REQ_OP_FLUSH:
>               type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_FLUSH;
>               break;
> +     case REQ_OP_DISCARD:
> +             type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_DISCARD;
> +             break;
>       case REQ_OP_SCSI_IN:
>       case REQ_OP_SCSI_OUT:
>               type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_SCSI_CMD;
> @@ -256,16 +259,24 @@ static int virtio_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>       vbr->out_hdr.type = cpu_to_virtio32(vblk->vdev, type);
>       vbr->out_hdr.sector = type ?
>               0 : cpu_to_virtio64(vblk->vdev, blk_rq_pos(req));
> -     vbr->out_hdr.ioprio = cpu_to_virtio32(vblk->vdev, req_get_ioprio(req));
> +     vbr->out_hdr.u.ioprio = cpu_to_virtio32(vblk->vdev, 
> req_get_ioprio(req));
>  
>       blk_mq_start_request(req);
>  
> -     num = blk_rq_map_sg(hctx->queue, req, vbr->sg);
> -     if (num) {
> -             if (rq_data_dir(req) == WRITE)
> -                     vbr->out_hdr.type |= cpu_to_virtio32(vblk->vdev, 
> VIRTIO_BLK_T_OUT);
> -             else
> -                     vbr->out_hdr.type |= cpu_to_virtio32(vblk->vdev, 
> VIRTIO_BLK_T_IN);
> +     if (type == VIRTIO_BLK_T_DISCARD) {
> +             vbr->out_hdr.u.discard_nr_sectors = cpu_to_virtio32(vblk->vdev,
> +                                                                 
> blk_rq_sectors(req));
> +             num = 0;
> +     } else {
> +             num = blk_rq_map_sg(hctx->queue, req, vbr->sg);
> +             if (num) {
> +                     if (rq_data_dir(req) == WRITE)
> +                             vbr->out_hdr.type |= cpu_to_virtio32(vblk->vdev,
> +                                                                  
> VIRTIO_BLK_T_OUT);
> +                     else
> +                             vbr->out_hdr.type |= cpu_to_virtio32(vblk->vdev,
> +                                                                  
> VIRTIO_BLK_T_IN);
> +             }
>       }
>  
>       spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vqs[qid].lock, flags);
> @@ -775,6 +786,15 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>       if (!err && opt_io_size)
>               blk_queue_io_opt(q, blk_size * opt_io_size);
>  
> +     if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_DISCARD)) {
> +             q->limits.discard_zeroes_data = 0;
> +             q->limits.discard_alignment = blk_size;
> +             q->limits.discard_granularity = blk_size;
> +             blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, UINT_MAX);
> +             blk_queue_max_discard_segments(q, 1);
> +             queue_flag_set_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, q);
> +     }

Please add configuration space fields for these limits.  Looking at the
virtio-scsi block limits code in QEMU's scsi_disk_emulate_inquiry() I
can see that the hypervisor has useful values that it wants to
communicate.  They shouldn't be hardcoded to blk_size.

> +
>       virtio_device_ready(vdev);
>  
>       device_add_disk(&vdev->dev, vblk->disk);
> @@ -882,14 +902,14 @@ static int virtblk_restore(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>       VIRTIO_BLK_F_SCSI,
>  #endif
>       VIRTIO_BLK_F_FLUSH, VIRTIO_BLK_F_TOPOLOGY, VIRTIO_BLK_F_CONFIG_WCE,
> -     VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ,
> +     VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ, VIRTIO_BLK_F_DISCARD,
>  }
>  ;
>  static unsigned int features[] = {
>       VIRTIO_BLK_F_SEG_MAX, VIRTIO_BLK_F_SIZE_MAX, VIRTIO_BLK_F_GEOMETRY,
>       VIRTIO_BLK_F_RO, VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE,
>       VIRTIO_BLK_F_FLUSH, VIRTIO_BLK_F_TOPOLOGY, VIRTIO_BLK_F_CONFIG_WCE,
> -     VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ,
> +     VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ, VIRTIO_BLK_F_DISCARD,
>  };
>  
>  static struct virtio_driver virtio_blk = {
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_blk.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_blk.h
> index 9ebe4d9..d608649 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_blk.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_blk.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
>  #define VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE        6       /* Block size of disk is 
> available*/
>  #define VIRTIO_BLK_F_TOPOLOGY        10      /* Topology information is 
> available */
>  #define VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ              12      /* support more than one vq */
> +#define VIRTIO_BLK_F_DISCARD 13      /* DISCARD command is supported */
>  
>  /* Legacy feature bits */
>  #ifndef VIRTIO_BLK_NO_LEGACY
> @@ -114,6 +115,9 @@ struct virtio_blk_config {
>  /* Get device ID command */
>  #define VIRTIO_BLK_T_GET_ID    8
>  
> +/* Discard command */
> +#define VIRTIO_BLK_T_DISCARD 16
> +
>  #ifndef VIRTIO_BLK_NO_LEGACY
>  /* Barrier before this op. */
>  #define VIRTIO_BLK_T_BARRIER 0x80000000
> @@ -127,8 +131,12 @@ struct virtio_blk_config {
>  struct virtio_blk_outhdr {
>       /* VIRTIO_BLK_T* */
>       __virtio32 type;
> -     /* io priority. */
> -     __virtio32 ioprio;
> +     union {
> +             /* io priority. */
> +             __virtio32 ioprio;
> +             /* discard number of sectors */
> +             __virtio32 discard_nr_sectors;
> +     } u;

DISCARD commands have no io priority?  Perhaps it's better to add an
extended header.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]