|
From: | Jason Wang |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio: destroy region cache during reset |
Date: | Fri, 10 Mar 2017 18:57:05 +0800 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 |
On 2017年03月09日 19:07, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 10:19:47 +0800 Jason Wang<address@hidden> wrote:On 2017年03月08日 18:12, Cornelia Huck wrote:On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:51:22 +0800 Jason Wang<address@hidden> wrote:On 2017年03月08日 17:19, Cornelia Huck wrote:On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 11:18:27 +0800 Jason Wang<address@hidden> wrote:On 2017年03月07日 18:16, Cornelia Huck wrote:On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:47:58 +0800 Jason Wang<address@hidden> wrote:We don't destroy region cache during reset which can make the maps of previous driver leaked to a buggy or malicious driver that don't set vring address before starting to use the device. Fix this by destroy the region cache during reset and validate it before trying to use them. While at it, also validate address_space_cache_init() during virtio_init_region_cache() to make sure we have a correct region cache. Signed-off-by: Jason Wang<address@hidden> --- hw/virtio/virtio.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) @@ -190,6 +211,10 @@ static inline uint16_t vring_avail_flags(VirtQueue *vq) { VRingMemoryRegionCaches *caches = atomic_rcu_read(&vq->vring.caches); hwaddr pa = offsetof(VRingAvail, flags); + if (!caches) { + virtio_error(vq->vdev, "Cannot map avail flags");I'm not sure that virtio_error is the right thing here; ending up in this function with !caches indicates an error in our logic.Probably not, this can be triggered by buggy guest.I would think that even a buggy guest should not be able to trigger accesses to vring structures that have not yet been set up. What am I missing?I think this may happen if a driver start the device without setting the vring address. In this case, region caches cache the mapping of previous driver. But maybe I was wrong.So the sequence would be: - Driver #1 sets up the device, then abandons it without cleaning up via resetIf driver #1 reset the device in this case, the caches would be NULL.Hm, how? Without your patch, the queue addresses are reset to 0 in that case but the cache is not cleaned up.
Yes, but with this patch, caches will be set to NULL during reset. So the following vq access without seting queue pfn may hit NULL.
Thanks
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |