qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/15] sheepdog: Fix snapshot ID parsing in _ope


From: Kevin Wolf
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/15] sheepdog: Fix snapshot ID parsing in _open(), _create, _goto()
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 14:25:35 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

Am 02.03.2017 um 22:43 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> sd_parse_uri() and sd_snapshot_goto() screw up error checking after
> strtoul(), and truncate long tag names silently.  Fix by replacing
> those parts by new sd_parse_snapid_or_tag(), which checks more
> carefully.
> 
> sd_snapshot_delete() also parses snapshot IDs, but is currently too
> broken for me to touch.  Mark TODO.
> 
> Two calls of strtol() without error checking remain in
> parse_redundancy().  Mark them FIXME.
> 
> More silent truncation of configuration strings remains elsewhere.
> Not marked.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <address@hidden>
> ---
>  block/sheepdog.c | 66 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/sheepdog.c b/block/sheepdog.c
> index 5554f47..deb110e 100644
> --- a/block/sheepdog.c
> +++ b/block/sheepdog.c
> @@ -914,6 +914,49 @@ static int get_sheep_fd(BDRVSheepdogState *s, Error 
> **errp)
>      return fd;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Parse numeric snapshot ID in @str
> + * If @str can't be parsed as number, return false.
> + * Else, if the number is zero or too large, set address@hidden to zero and
> + * return true.
> + * Else, set address@hidden to the number and return true.
> + */
> +static bool sd_parse_snapid(const char *str, uint32_t *snapid)
> +{
> +    unsigned long ul;
> +    int ret;
> +
> +    ret = qemu_strtoul(str, NULL, 10, &ul);
> +    if (ret == -ERANGE) {
> +        ul = ret = 0;
> +    }
> +    if (ret) {
> +        return false;
> +    }
> +    if (ul > UINT32_MAX) {
> +        ul = 0;
> +    }
> +
> +    *snapid  = ul;

Redundant space.

> +    return true;
> +}

Looks good otherwise.

Kevin



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]