qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qemu 1/2] exec, kvm, target-ppc: Move getrampage


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qemu 1/2] exec, kvm, target-ppc: Move getrampagesize() to common code
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 13:52:27 +1100
User-agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)

On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 12:06:14PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 07:12:53PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> > On 10/02/17 11:41, David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 12:48:19PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 09/02/2017 06:43, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> > >>> On 03/01/17 10:34, David Gibson wrote:
> > >>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 04:22:11PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> > >>>>> getrampagesize() returns the largest supported page size and mainly
> > >>>>> used to know if huge pages are enabled.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> However is implemented in target-ppc/kvm.c and not available
> > >>>>> in TCG or other architectures.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> This renames and moves gethugepagesize() to mmap-alloc.c where
> > >>>>> fd-based analog of it is already implemented. This renames and moves
> > >>>>> getrampagesize() to exec.c as it seems to be the common place for
> > >>>>> helpers like this.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> This first user for it is going to be a spapr-pci-host-bridge which
> > >>>>> needs to know the largest RAM page size so the guest could try
> > >>>>> using bigger IOMMU pages to save memory.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Reviewed-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Seems sensible to me, but I'm not comfortable merging this via my tree
> > >>>> since it touches such core code.  Probably should go via Paolo.
> > >>>
> > >>> Paolo, ping?
> > >>
> > >> It's just code movement, go ahead.
> > > 
> > > Ok, I've merged this in my tree.
> > 
> > 
> > I cannot find it in any public tree, where did it go?
> 
> Bother, I thought I'd applied it, but I seem to have mislaid it.  Can
> you resend it to me please.

So, I manage to dig this up from my archives, but it doesn't seem to
apply properly on the current tree.  The actual merge conflicts were
easy to resolve, but then it doesn't compile.

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]