Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v2 00/13] Rewrite NVIC to not depend on the GIC

[Peter Maydell]

On 24 February 2017 at 14:40, Alex Bennée <address@hidden> wrote:
> The tests currently fail to build:
>
> /usr/bin/arm-none-eabi-objcopy -S -O binary test6-kern.elf test6-kern.bin
> test7.c: In function 'usage':
> test7.c:58:9: error: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but 
> argument 2 has type 'uint32_t' [-Werror=format=]
>          testDiag("Ignoring bogus LR %x, doing return to handler", old_lr);
>          ^
> test7.c:76:9: error: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but 
> argument 2 has type 'uint32_t' [-Werror=format=]
>          testDiag("Ignoring bogus LR %x, doing return to thread", old_lr);
>          ^
> test7.c: In function 'svc':
> test7.c:105:9: error: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', 
> but argument 2 has type 'uint32_t' [-Werror=format=]
>          testDiag("New xPSR %x", sframe[7]);
>          ^
> test7.c:109:9: error: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', 
> but argument 2 has type 'uint32_t' [-Werror=format=]
>          testDiag("old xPSR %x", sframe[7]);
>          ^
> test7.c:116:9: error: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', 
> but argument 2 has type 'uint32_t' [-Werror=format=]
>          testDiag("In SVC handler (direct call from main with LR %x)", 
> old_lr);
>          ^
> /usr/bin/arm-none-eabi-objcopy -S -O binary test8-kern.elf test8-kern.bin
> /usr/bin/arm-none-eabi-objcopy -S -O binary test9-kern.elf test9-kern.bin
> /usr/bin/arm-none-eabi-objcopy -S -O binary test10-kern.elf test10-kern.bin
> /usr/bin/arm-none-eabi-objcopy -S -O binary test11-kern.elf test11-kern.bin
> /usr/bin/arm-none-eabi-objcopy -S -O binary test13-kern.elf test13-kern.bin
> /usr/bin/arm-none-eabi-objcopy -S -O binary test14-kern.elf test14-kern.bin
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> Makefile:49: recipe for target 'test7.o' failed
> make: *** [test7.o] Error 1
> make: Target 'all' not remade because of errors.
>
> I suspect its the same thing as I came across with kvm-unit-tests that
> compilers targeting the same abi can still disagree about sizes:
>
>   
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/virt/kvm/kvm-unit-tests.git/commit/?id=529046c397059b8c5ef4dc5fb3c258d86fafb126

Could be. I use arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc to build. If you use
PRIx32 does it build OK?

thanks
-- PMM