qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] linux-user: Add signal handling for x86_64


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] linux-user: Add signal handling for x86_64
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 13:12:35 +0000

On 25 January 2017 at 00:10, Pranith Kumar <address@hidden> wrote:
> Adopted from a previous patch posting:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-07/msg02079.html
>
> CC: Allan Wirth <address@hidden>
> CC: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <address@hidden>

Thanks for picking this patch up. A nit about commit message format:
because this  is mostly Allan's work you need to add his signed-off-by:
line (which he provided on his original patch posting), and make
a brief not of what was changed, so it looks like:

  Signed-off-by: Original Author <address@hidden>
  [OP: changed X, Y, Z]
  Signed-off-by: Other Person <address@hidden>

It's also in this kind of situation worth considering whether the
patch would be better attributed to Allan as the git commit 'author'.
If I've taken somebody else's work and made mostly minor overhauls
to it I tend to go for giving them credit in the git commit log.

> ---
>  linux-user/signal.c      | 264 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  target/i386/cpu.h        |   2 +
>  target/i386/fpu_helper.c |  12 +++
>  3 files changed, 242 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/linux-user/signal.c b/linux-user/signal.c
> index 0a5bb4e26b..0248621d66 100644
> --- a/linux-user/signal.c
> +++ b/linux-user/signal.c
> @@ -253,8 +253,7 @@ int do_sigprocmask(int how, const sigset_t *set, sigset_t 
> *oldset)
>      return 0;
>  }
>
> -#if !defined(TARGET_OPENRISC) && !defined(TARGET_UNICORE32) && \
> -    !defined(TARGET_X86_64)
> +#if !defined(TARGET_OPENRISC) && !defined(TARGET_UNICORE32)
>  /* Just set the guest's signal mask to the specified value; the
>   * caller is assumed to have called block_signals() already.
>   */

There's a minor conflict here with the Nios2 code that's now
in master (which added another clause to this #if), but it's
trivial to resolve.

Otherwise:

Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]