qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v2 00/41] Misc patches for 2017-01-27


From: Laszlo Ersek
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v2 00/41] Misc patches for 2017-01-27
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 14:29:38 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0

On 01/30/17 13:57, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 30 January 2017 at 12:33, Laszlo Ersek <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Peter,
>>
>> On 01/27/17 20:35, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> The following changes since commit 29ba0cdc1fd1300f910d150c03a0f74236083bf7:
>>>
>>>   Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/armbru/tags/pull-qapi-2017-01-27' 
>>> into staging (2017-01-27 15:20:08 +0000)
>>>
>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>
>>>   git://github.com/bonzini/qemu.git tags/for-upstream
>>>
>>> for you to fetch changes up to 6da67de6803e93cbb7e93ac3497865832f8c00ea:
>>>
>>>   memory: don't sign-extend 32-bit writes (2017-01-27 18:08:00 +0100)
>>>
>>
>> Can you please pull this v2?
> 
> I am currently processing it, yes. Paolo only sent it to the list

Apologies, I missed that.

> late on Friday evening, and I don't generally work weekends,

I didn't try to imply that you should have -- I also don't check my work
email over the weekend, on purpose. I check the occasional public list
archive, maybe.

> so it's not like this has been lying around for a long time...

Yeah I was conflicted whether I should ping you or not... The very first
version of the patches goes back to October 2015; I may have gotten
over-enthusiastic about the feature being finally merged, and possibly
made the wrong call. Sorry.

(BTW I know about <http://patchew.org/QEMU/>, and for the v1 pull req, I
did notice quickly enough the conflict ("Failed in applying to current
master"), even before reading your feedback on-list; but for v2, patchew
only says "Series not complete".)

It's difficult to ask politely in email... I tend to start with
apologizing and various disclaimers, saying "please" and "thank you"
profusely, but I've also been told that I should be more "assertive"...
Sigh.

Thank you anyway, and sorry about the poke. It was meant in good faith.
Laszlo




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]