qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-stable] [Qemu-ppc] [PULL 0/4] ppc patches for qem


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-stable] [Qemu-ppc] [PULL 0/4] ppc patches for qemu-2.7 stable branch
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 12:41:29 +1100
User-agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 04:24:31PM -0500, Michael Roth wrote:
> Quoting Peter Maydell (2016-10-17 13:45:21)
> > On 17 October 2016 at 19:13, Michael Roth <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > We could do both though: use some ad-hoc way to tag for a particular
> > > sub-maintainer tree/stable branch, as well as an explicit "not for
> > > master" in the cover letter ensure it doesn't go into master. It's a bit
> > > more redundant, but flexible in that people can use whatever tagging
> > > format they want for a particular tree.
> > 
> > Yes, that would be my preference. Gmail's filtering is not
> > very good, and it doesn't seem to be able to support
> > multiple or complex matches on the subject line, but
> > it can deal with "doesn't include foo in body".
> > People who actively want to look for stuff not to go
> > into master can filter it however they like.
> 
> Sounds good to me. For my part I think "for-2.7.1" etc. would be
> prefereable. No need to resend this patchset though.
> 
> I suppose MAINTAINERS would be the best place to document something
> like this?

So.. regardless of the outcome in general for future stable merges..

Has this batch been merged for 2.7 stable?  Or do I need to resend it
in the new style?

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]