Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/4] QOM class properties - do we need them?

[Kevin Wolf]

Am 29.09.2016 um 12:23 hat Andreas Färber geschrieben:
> Am 29.09.2016 um 12:21 schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:12:32PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> >> Am 29.09.2016 um 10:14 schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
> >>> Practically all instances properties should become class properties
> >>> as its going to save wasting memory once most are converted.
> >>
> >> Not all, but most. child<> properties were the reason to have properties
> >> on the instance.
> > 
> > That's why I said "Practically all", instead of just "all" :-)
> 
> To me as non-native speaker "practically" is the opposite of
> "theoretically". :)

To me it made perfect sense that "pratically all" means "praktisch
alle". ;-)

Kevin