qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7] linux-user: Fix llseek with high bit of


From: Riku Voipio
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7] linux-user: Fix llseek with high bit of offset_low set
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 16:44:08 +0300
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

Hi,

applied to linux-user-for upstream.

Riku

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:41:35PM +0900, Chanho Park wrote:
> It works perfectly.
> Thanks.
> 
> Tested-by: Chanho Park <address@hidden>
> 
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 2:59 AM, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
> > The llseek syscall takes two 32-bit arguments, offset_high
> > and offset_low, which must be combined to form a single
> > 64-bit offset. Unfortunately we were combining them with
> >    (uint64_t)arg2 << 32) | arg3
> > and arg3 is a signed type; this meant that when promoting
> > arg3 to a 64-bit type it would be sign-extended. The effect
> > was that if the offset happened to have bit 31 set then
> > this bit would get sign-extended into all of bits 63..32.
> > Explicitly cast arg3 to abi_ulong to avoid the erroneous
> > sign extension.
> >
> > Reported-by: Chanho Park <address@hidden>
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > Long-standing bug and we're quite close to 2.7 but the
> > fix is trivial so if somebody would like to review it
> > I think we could put it in...
> >
> >  linux-user/syscall.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c
> > index ebdb753..b4e21d3 100644
> > --- a/linux-user/syscall.c
> > +++ b/linux-user/syscall.c
> > @@ -9406,7 +9406,7 @@ abi_long do_syscall(void *cpu_env, int num, abi_long 
> > arg1,
> >          {
> >              int64_t res;
> >  #if !defined(__NR_llseek)
> > -            res = lseek(arg1, ((uint64_t)arg2 << 32) | arg3, arg5);
> > +            res = lseek(arg1, ((uint64_t)arg2 << 32) | (abi_ulong)arg3, 
> > arg5);
> >              if (res == -1) {
> >                  ret = get_errno(res);
> >              } else {
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> Chanho Park



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]