qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 10/19] pc: register created initial and hotpl


From: Igor Mammedov
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 10/19] pc: register created initial and hotpluged CPUs in one place pc_cpu_plug()
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 11:18:36 +0200

On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 20:37:13 -0300
Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 06:59:21PM -0400, Bandan Das wrote:
> > Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> writes:
> >   
> > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 06:32:27PM -0400, Bandan Das wrote:  
> > >> Igor Mammedov <address@hidden> writes:
> > >>   
> > >> > consolidate possible_cpus array management in pc_cpu_plug()
> > >> > for smp_cpus, coldplugged with -device and hotplugged with
> > >> > device_add.  
> > >> 
> > >> So, this takes care of the hotplug case and 09/19 took care of the
> > >> coldplug case, right ? If yes, we should probably modify this commit
> > >> message a little.  
> > >
> > > This makes pc_cpu_plug() take care of both: now it will handle
> > > the coldplug case also (in addition to the hotplug case, that it
> > > already handled). I don't understand what you mean.
> > >
> > > Are you talking about the rtc_set_memory() call, only? This seems
> > > to be the only hotplug-specific code that still remains, in this  
> > 
> > Right, I thought the rtc_set_memory() call in 09/19 takes care of the
> > case when the user boots with "-device" and this takes care of the case
> > when user invokes device_add, no ?  
> 
> Yes for rtc_set_memory(). But the main purpose of this patch is
> to reuse all the rest of pc_cpu_plug() (i.e. everything except
> for the rtc_set_memory() call) for the coldplug CPUs too.
> 
> Note that I didn't review the patch completely, yet. The
> replacement for the possible_cpus code looks OK, but I didn't
> check if it is safe to call
> HOTPLUG_HANDLER_GET_CLASS(pcms->acpi_dev)->plug() for coldplugged
> CPUs too.
for cpus created at  pc_cpus_init() time, that path is unreachable
since pcms->acpi_dev == NULL,

even if in the future that path becomes reachable
(when we could specify all CPUs including BSP with -device, it doesn't work for 
BSP yet)
 i.e. pcms->acpi_dev != NULL
then acpi_device will have be initialized see cpu_hotplug_hw_init()
and following plug handler will be called acpi_cpu_plug_cb() doing what
it was supposed to do.

> 
> >   
> > > patch.
> > >  
> > >> 
> > >> Bandan  
> > >> > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
> > >> > ---
> > >> >  hw/i386/pc.c | 25 +++++++++----------------
> > >> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > >> >
> > >> > diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
> > >> > index 3206572..0f85b56 100644
> > >> > --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
> > >> > +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
> > >> > @@ -1142,7 +1142,6 @@ void pc_cpus_init(PCMachineState *pcms)
> > >> >          if (i < smp_cpus) {
> > >> >              cpu = pc_new_cpu(typename, x86_cpu_apic_id_from_index(i),
> > >> >                               &error_fatal);
> > >> > -            pcms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].cpu = CPU(cpu);
> > >> >              object_unref(OBJECT(cpu));
> > >> >          }
> > >> >      }
> > >> > @@ -1697,25 +1696,19 @@ static void pc_cpu_plug(HotplugHandler 
> > >> > *hotplug_dev,
> > >> >      Error *local_err = NULL;
> > >> >      PCMachineState *pcms = PC_MACHINE(hotplug_dev);
> > >> >  
> > >> > -    if (!dev->hotplugged) {
> > >> > -        goto out;
> > >> > -    }
> > >> > -
> > >> > -    if (!pcms->acpi_dev) {
> > >> > -        error_setg(&local_err,
> > >> > -                   "cpu hotplug is not enabled: missing acpi device");
> > >> > -        goto out;
> > >> > +    if (pcms->acpi_dev) {
> > >> > +        hhc = HOTPLUG_HANDLER_GET_CLASS(pcms->acpi_dev);
> > >> > +        hhc->plug(HOTPLUG_HANDLER(pcms->acpi_dev), dev, &local_err);
> > >> > +        if (local_err) {
> > >> > +            goto out;
> > >> > +        }
> > >> >      }
> > >> >  
> > >> > -    hhc = HOTPLUG_HANDLER_GET_CLASS(pcms->acpi_dev);
> > >> > -    hhc->plug(HOTPLUG_HANDLER(pcms->acpi_dev), dev, &local_err);
> > >> > -    if (local_err) {
> > >> > -        goto out;
> > >> > +    if (dev->hotplugged) {
> > >> > +        /* increment the number of CPUs */
> > >> > +        rtc_set_memory(pcms->rtc, 0x5f, rtc_get_memory(pcms->rtc, 
> > >> > 0x5f) + 1);
> > >> >      }
> > >> >  
> > >> > -    /* increment the number of CPUs */
> > >> > -    rtc_set_memory(pcms->rtc, 0x5f, rtc_get_memory(pcms->rtc, 0x5f) + 
> > >> > 1);
> > >> > -
> > >> >      found_cpu = pc_find_cpu_slot(pcms, CPU(dev), NULL);
> > >> >      found_cpu->cpu = CPU(dev);
> > >> >  out:  
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]