qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v10 27/26] intel_iommu: disallow kernel-irqchip=


From: David Kiarie
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v10 27/26] intel_iommu: disallow kernel-irqchip=on with IR
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 13:17:40 +0300

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Peter Xu <address@hidden> wrote:
> When user specify "kernel-irqchip=on", throw error and then quit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <address@hidden>
> ---
>
> One more patch for this series. Without this one, guest kernel will
> possibly hang. This is not user friendly.
>
>  hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> index 4ff9a24..618b0f9 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>   */
>
>  #include "qemu/osdep.h"
> +#include "qemu/error-report.h"
>  #include "hw/sysbus.h"
>  #include "exec/address-spaces.h"
>  #include "intel_iommu_internal.h"
> @@ -29,6 +30,7 @@
>  #include "hw/boards.h"
>  #include "hw/i386/x86-iommu.h"
>  #include "hw/pci-host/q35.h"
> +#include "sysemu/kvm.h"
>
>  /*#define DEBUG_INTEL_IOMMU*/
>  #ifdef DEBUG_INTEL_IOMMU
> @@ -2458,6 +2460,13 @@ static void vtd_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>      bus->iommu_opaque = dev;
>      /* Pseudo address space under root PCI bus. */
>      pcms->ioapic_as = vtd_host_dma_iommu(bus, s, Q35_PSEUDO_DEVFN_IOAPIC);
> +
> +    /* Currently Intel IOMMU IR only support "kernel-irqchip={off|split}" */
> +    if (kvm_irqchip_in_kernel() && !kvm_irqchip_is_split()) {
> +        error_report("Intel Interrupt Remapping cannot work with "
> +                     "kernel-irqchip=on, please use 'split|off'.");
> +        exit(1);
> +    }
>  }

Shouldn't you be checking whether VT-d interrupt remapping is
enabled(I'm assuming it's off by default) before you ensure
kernel-irqchip=off|split ? Doesn't the above imply that one can't use
VT-d with kernel_irqchip=on (regardless of whether IR is enabled) ?

>
>  static void vtd_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
> --
> 2.4.11
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]