[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [Nbd] [PATCH v4 04/11] nbd: Improve server handling of
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [Nbd] [PATCH v4 04/11] nbd: Improve server handling of bogus commands |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Jun 2016 12:34:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 |
On 15/06/2016 12:27, Alex Bligh wrote:
>
> On 15 Jun 2016, at 10:18, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>>> So what should those servers do (like 2 of mine) which don't buffer
>>> the entire read, if they get an error having already sent some data?
>>
>> They have sent an error code of zero, and it turned out to be wrong. So
>> the only thing they can do safely is disconnect.
>
> Right, but that is not what Wouter's change says:
>
> + If an error occurs, the server SHOULD set the appropriate error code
> + in the error field. The server MAY then initiate a hard disconnect.
> + If it chooses not to, it MUST NOT send any payload for this request.
>
> I read this as either
>
> a) the server can issue a hard disconnect without sending any reply; or
>
> b) it must send the reply header with no payload
>
> It also seems to permit not setting the error code (it's only a 'SHOULD'),
> not disconnecting (it's a MAY), then not sending any payload, which is a
> nonsense.
Right.
> Perhaps this should read "If an error occurs, the server MUST either initiate
> a hard disconnect before the entire payload has been sent or
> set the appropriate code in the error field and send the response header
> without any payload." if we want to go down this route.
Yes, I agree.
I do believe we want to go down this route. I think we agree that
partial buffering may always require the server to disconnect after an
error. Therefore I don't see any benefit at all in sending a payload
after an error message.
Paolo
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 04/11] nbd: Improve server handling of bogus commands, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 04/11] nbd: Improve server handling of bogus commands, Paolo Bonzini, 2016/06/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 04/11] nbd: Improve server handling of bogus commands, Alex Bligh, 2016/06/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 04/11] nbd: Improve server handling of bogus commands, Paolo Bonzini, 2016/06/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 04/11] nbd: Improve server handling of bogus commands, Alex Bligh, 2016/06/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 04/11] nbd: Improve server handling of bogus commands, Paolo Bonzini, 2016/06/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Nbd] [PATCH v4 04/11] nbd: Improve server handling of bogus commands, Wouter Verhelst, 2016/06/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Nbd] [PATCH v4 04/11] nbd: Improve server handling of bogus commands, Wouter Verhelst, 2016/06/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Nbd] [PATCH v4 04/11] nbd: Improve server handling of bogus commands, Alex Bligh, 2016/06/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Nbd] [PATCH v4 04/11] nbd: Improve server handling of bogus commands, Paolo Bonzini, 2016/06/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Nbd] [PATCH v4 04/11] nbd: Improve server handling of bogus commands, Alex Bligh, 2016/06/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Nbd] [PATCH v4 04/11] nbd: Improve server handling of bogus commands,
Paolo Bonzini <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Nbd] [PATCH v4 04/11] nbd: Improve server handling of bogus commands, Wouter Verhelst, 2016/06/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Nbd] [PATCH v4 04/11] nbd: Improve server handling of bogus commands, Wouter Verhelst, 2016/06/15
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 04/11] nbd: Improve server handling of bogus commands, Paolo Bonzini, 2016/06/13