On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Zhou Jie <address@hidden> wrote:
TO Alex
TO Michael
In your solution you add a emulate PCI bridge to act as
a bridge between direct assigned devices and the host bridge.
Do you mean put all direct assigned devices to
one emulate PCI bridge?
If yes, this maybe bring some problems.
We are writing a patchset to support aer feature in qemu.
When assigning a vfio device with AER enabled, we must check whether
the device supports a host bus reset (ie. hot reset) as this may be
used by the guest OS in order to recover the device from an AER
error.
QEMU must therefore have the ability to perform a physical
host bus reset using the existing vfio APIs in response to a virtual
bus reset in the VM.
A physical bus reset affects all of the devices on the host bus.
Therefore all physical devices affected by a bus reset must be
configured on the same virtual bus in the VM.
And no devices unaffected by the bus reset,
be configured on the same virtual bus.
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-05/msg02989.html
Sincerely,
Zhou Jie
That makes sense, but I don't think you have to worry much about this
at this point at least on my side as this was mostly just theory and I
haven't had a chance to put any of it into practice as of yet.
My idea has been evolving on this for a while. One thought I had is
that we may want to have something like an emulated IOMMU and if
possible we would want to split it up over multiple domains just so we
can be certain that the virtual interfaces and the physical ones
existed in separate domains. In regards to your concerns perhaps what
we could do is put each assigned device into its own domain to prevent
them from affecting each other. To that end we could probably break
things up so that each device effectively lives in its own PCIe slot
in the emulated system. Then when we start a migration of the guest
the assigned device domains would then have to be tracked for unmap
and sync calls when the direction is from the device.
I will keep your concerns in mind in the future when I get some time
to look at exploring this solution further.
- Alex