qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH v19 09/10] tests: add unit test cas


From: Changlong Xie
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH v19 09/10] tests: add unit test case for replication
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 18:21:52 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0

On 05/31/2016 01:34 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 03:36:19PM +0800, Changlong Xie wrote:
+/* primary */
+#define P_LOCAL_DISK "/tmp/p_local_disk.XXXXXX"
+#define P_COMMAND "driver=replication,mode=primary,node-name=xxx,"\
+                  "file.driver=qcow2,file.file.filename="P_LOCAL_DISK
+
+/* secondary */
+#define S_LOCAL_DISK "/tmp/s_local_disk.XXXXXX"
+#define S_ACTIVE_DISK "/tmp/s_active_disk.XXXXXX"
+#define S_HIDDEN_DISK "/tmp/s_hidden_disk.XXXXXX"

Please use unique filenames so that multiple instances of the test can
run in parallel on a single machine.  mkstemp(3) can be used to do this.


will fix in next version.

+static void io_read(BlockDriverState *bs, long pattern, int64_t pattern_offset,
+                    int64_t pattern_count, int64_t offset, int64_t count,
+                    bool expect_failed)
+{
+    char *buf;
+    void *cmp_buf;
+    int ret;
+
+    /* 1. alloc pattern buffer */
+    if (pattern) {
+        cmp_buf = g_malloc(pattern_count);
+        memset(cmp_buf, pattern, pattern_count);
+    }
+
+    /* 2. alloc read buffer */
+    buf = qemu_blockalign(bs, count);
+    memset(buf, 0xab, count);
+
+    /* 3. do read */
+    ret = bdrv_read(bs, offset >> 9, (uint8_t *)buf, count >> 9);
+
+    /* 4. assert and compare buf */
+    if (expect_failed) {
+        g_assert(ret < 0);
+    } else {
+        g_assert(ret >= 0);
+        if (pattern) {
+            g_assert(memcmp(buf + pattern_offset, cmp_buf, pattern_count) <= 
0);
+            g_free(cmp_buf);

if pattern && expect_failed then cmp_buf is leaked.  Probably best to
initialize cmp_buf = NULL and have an unconditional g_free(cmp_buf) at
the end of the function to avoid leaks.


Yes, you are right.

+        }
+    }
+    g_free(buf);

qemu_blockalign() memory is freed with qemu_vfree(), not g_free().


will fix

+static void test_primary_do_checkpoint(void)
+{
+    BlockDriverState *bs;
+    Error *local_err = NULL;
+
+    bs = start_primary();
+
+    replication_do_checkpoint_all(&local_err);
+    g_assert(!local_err);
+
+    teardown_primary(bs);
+}

Shouldn't replication_start_all() be called before
replication_do_checkpoint_all()?


It seems i missed it.

+int main(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+    int ret;
+    qemu_init_main_loop(&error_fatal);
+    bdrv_init();
+
+    do {} while (g_main_context_iteration(NULL, false));

Why is this necessary?

Will remove it.







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]