[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/31] Misc changes for 2016-05-27
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/31] Misc changes for 2016-05-27 |
Date: |
Fri, 27 May 2016 16:07:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 |
On 27/05/2016 16:04, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > i686-w64-mingw32-ld -m i386pe -Ttext 0 -e _start -s -o
> > > linuxboot_dma.img linuxboot_dma.o
> > > linuxboot_dma.o:linuxboot_dma.c:(.text+0x57): undefined reference to
> > > `load_kernel'
> > >
> > > Building an image for the target using our host compiler seems like
> > > an odd choice,
> >
> > Which compiler should I be using?
>
> I would have expected that how we build a guest image ought to
> be the same regardless of how we're building QEMU itself.
> (You wouldn't try to build an i386 image with $(CC) if you're
> on an ARM host, for instance.)
> However, given that the makefile already works this way, better
> to go with the flow...
Yeah, however currently the ROMs are only built if you are not doing a
cross build.
Thanks,
Paolo
- [Qemu-devel] [PULL 23/31] scsi-disk: introduce dma_readv and dma_writev, (continued)
- [Qemu-devel] [PULL 23/31] scsi-disk: introduce dma_readv and dma_writev, Paolo Bonzini, 2016/05/27
- [Qemu-devel] [PULL 27/31] scsi-generic: Merge block max xfer len in INQUIRY response, Paolo Bonzini, 2016/05/27
- [Qemu-devel] [PULL 31/31] exec: hide mr->ram_addr from qemu_get_ram_ptr users, Paolo Bonzini, 2016/05/27
- [Qemu-devel] [PULL 29/31] exec: remove ram_addr argument from qemu_ram_block_from_host, Paolo Bonzini, 2016/05/27
- [Qemu-devel] [PULL 28/31] memory: remove qemu_get_ram_fd, qemu_set_ram_fd, qemu_ram_block_host_ptr, Paolo Bonzini, 2016/05/27
- [Qemu-devel] [PULL 30/31] memory: split memory_region_from_host from qemu_ram_addr_from_host, Paolo Bonzini, 2016/05/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/31] Misc changes for 2016-05-27, Peter Maydell, 2016/05/27