qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/i386/acpi-build: place qword descriptors in


From: Marcel Apfelbaum
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/i386/acpi-build: place qword descriptors in bridge _CRS's when needed
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:07:17 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0

On 03/14/2016 03:42 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
In build_crs(), the calculation & merging of the ranges already happens in
64-bit, but the entry boundaries are silently truncated to 32-bit in the
call to aml_dword_memory(). Use aml_qword_memory() when necessary -- this
fixes 64-bit BARs behind PXBs.


Hi Laszlo,
Thanks for the patch.

Please see below some comments.


Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <address@hidden>
---
  hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
index b88800883944..3157cc36db98 100644
--- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
+++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
@@ -938,13 +938,25 @@ static Aml *build_crs(PCIHostState *host,

      crs_range_merge(host_mem_ranges);
      for (i = 0; i < host_mem_ranges->len; i++) {
+        Aml *mem;
+        uint64_t length;
+
          entry = g_ptr_array_index(host_mem_ranges, i);
-        aml_append(crs,
-                   aml_dword_memory(AML_POS_DECODE, AML_MIN_FIXED,
-                                    AML_MAX_FIXED, AML_NON_CACHEABLE,
-                                    AML_READ_WRITE,
-                                    0, entry->base, entry->limit, 0,
-                                    entry->limit - entry->base + 1));
+        length = entry->limit - entry->base + 1;
+        if (entry->limit <= UINT32_MAX && length <= UINT32_MAX) {

Why do we need to check the length if we've already checked the entry->limit ?

+          mem = aml_dword_memory(AML_POS_DECODE, AML_MIN_FIXED,
+                                 AML_MAX_FIXED, AML_NON_CACHEABLE,
+                                 AML_READ_WRITE,
+                                 0, entry->base, entry->limit, 0,
+                                 length);
+        } else {
+          mem = aml_qword_memory(AML_POS_DECODE, AML_MIN_FIXED,
+                                 AML_MAX_FIXED, AML_NON_CACHEABLE,
+                                 AML_READ_WRITE,
+                                 0, entry->base, entry->limit, 0,
+                                 length);
+        }
+        aml_append(crs, mem);
          crs_range_insert(mem_ranges, entry->base, entry->limit);
      }
      g_ptr_array_free(host_mem_ranges, true);


I think it is correct, but this also means the mem_ranges array can have 64-bit 
ranges =>
the 'crs_replace_with_free_ranges' call for mem_ranges is also incorrect because
it assumes all the ranges are between [pci->w32.begin, pci->w32.end - 1].

And of course this would also interfere with the crs building for pci->w64.
We can't assign all the [pci->w64.begin, pci->w64.end - 1] range to bus 0 
anymore,
we need to take out the ranges used by pxbs. (same as we did for pci->w32)

Indeed, this is one of the pxb limitations, supporting only 32bit BARs and your
patch is going in the right direction.

Do you want to continue it? I will not be available for one week, but I can 
take care of it
after that.

Thanks!
Marcel







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]