[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] hmp: Extend drive_del to delete nodes witho
From: |
Kevin Wolf |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] hmp: Extend drive_del to delete nodes without BB |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Feb 2016 19:23:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Am 24.02.2016 um 18:54 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> On 23.02.2016 18:16, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Now that we can use drive_add to create new nodes without a BB, we also
> > want to be able to delete such nodes again.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > blockdev.c | 9 +++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/blockdev.c b/blockdev.c
> > index 3f46bc1..b76b6cd 100644
> > --- a/blockdev.c
> > +++ b/blockdev.c
> > @@ -2816,6 +2816,15 @@ void hmp_drive_del(Monitor *mon, const QDict *qdict)
> > AioContext *aio_context;
> > Error *local_err = NULL;
> >
> > + bs = bdrv_find_node(id);
> > + if (bs) {
> > + qmp_x_blockdev_del(false, NULL, true, id, &local_err);
> > + if (local_err) {
> > + error_report_err(local_err);
> > + }
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > blk = blk_by_name(id);
> > if (!blk) {
> > error_report("Device '%s' not found", id);
> >
>
> It's a bit strange to require the user to specify the node name using
> "node-name" for drive_add, but the to use "id" in drive_del; especially
> because x-blockdev-del uses "node-name", too.
Not sure I understand. For the user of drive_del that's simply a
positional parameter, so they use neither "id" nor "node-name". Am I
missing something?
Kevin
> Up to your discretion.
>
> Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <address@hidden>
>
pgpV2CQpHN6co.pgp
Description: PGP signature