qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 00/16] Slow-path for atomic instruction transla


From: alvise rigo
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 00/16] Slow-path for atomic instruction translation
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:01:05 +0100

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Alex Bennée <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Alvise Rigo <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> This is the seventh iteration of the patch series which applies to the
>> upstream branch of QEMU (v2.5.0-rc4).
>>
>> Changes versus previous versions are at the bottom of this cover letter.
>>
>> The code is also available at following repository:
>> https://git.virtualopensystems.com/dev/qemu-mt.git
>> branch:
>> slowpath-for-atomic-v7-no-mttcg
>
> OK I'm done on this review pass. I think generally we are in pretty good
> shape although I await to see what extra needs to be done for the MTTCG
> case.

Hi Alex,

Thank you for this review. Regarding the extra needs and integration
with the MTTCG code, I've made available at this address [1] a working
branch with the two patch series merged together. The branch boots
fine Linux on both aarch64 and arm architectures. There is still that
known issue with virtio, that Fred should fix soon. Let me know your
first impressions.

[1] https://git.virtualopensystems.com/dev/qemu-mt.git (branch
"merging-slowpath-v7-mttcg-v8-wip")

Thank you,
alvise

>
> We are coming up to soft-freeze on 1/3/16 and it would be nice to get
> this merged by then. As it is a fairly major chunk of work it would need
> to get the initial commit by that date.
>
> However before we can get to that stage we need some review from the
> maintainers. For your next version can you please:
>
>   - Drop the RFC tag, I think we have had enough comment ;-)
>   - Make sure you CC the TCG maintainers (Paolo, Peter C and Richard 
> Henderson)
>   - Also CC the ARM maintainers (Peter M)
>   - Be ready for a fast turnaround
>
> Paolo/Richard,
>
> Do you have any comments on this iteration?
>
> --
> Alex Bennée



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]