qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 0/5] add ACPI node for fw_cfg on pc and arm


From: Gabriel L. Somlo
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 0/5] add ACPI node for fw_cfg on pc and arm
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 12:55:27 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:16:57AM -0500, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
> Ping.
> 
> Now that the kernel side seems to have been accepted (Thanks again
> Laszlo and Matt for all the help and advice!!!), is there anything
> left to clean up before this series could be applied to QEMU ?

Actually, I take that back. I need to rebase the i386 patch (3/5) to
handle PcGuestInfo changes (commits fb306ff and f264d36); but right
now I'm bisecting, trying to figure out why after a giant git pull my
video suddenly stopped working ...

I'll be back soon with v7, stay tuned.

Thanks,
--Gabriel

> 
> gmane.org quick links:
> 1/5: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/389896/raw
> 2/5: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/389894/raw
> 3/5: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/389895/raw
> 4/5: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/389900/raw
> 5/5: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/389898/raw
> 
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:00:52PM -0500, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
> > New since v5:
> > 
> >     - rebased on top of latest QEMU git master
> > 
> > Thanks,
> >   --Gabriel
> > 
> > >New since v4:
> > >
> > >   - rebased on top of Marc's DMA series
> > >   - drop machine compat dependency for insertion into x86/ssdt
> > >     (patch 3/5), following agreement between Igor and Eduardo
> > >   - [mm]io register range now covers DMA register as well, if
> > >     available.
> > >   - s/bios/firmware in doc file updates
> > >
> > >>New since v3:
> > >>
> > >>  - rebased to work on top of 87e896ab (introducing pc-*-25 classes),
> > >>    inserting fw_cfg acpi node only for machines >= 2.5.
> > >>
> > >>  - reintroduce _STA with value 0x0B (bit 2 for u/i visibility turned
> > >>    off to avoid Windows complaining -- thanks Igor for catching that!)
> > >>
> > >>If there's any other feedback besides questions regarding the
> > >>appropriateness of "QEMU0002" as the value of _HID, please don't hesitate!
> > >>
> > >>>New since v2:
> > >>>
> > >>> - pc/i386 node in ssdt only on machine types *newer* than 2.4
> > >>>   (as suggested by Eduardo)
> > >>>
> > >>>I appreciate any further comments and reviews. Hopefully we can make
> > >>>this palatable for upstream, modulo the lingering concerns about whether
> > >>>"QEMU0002" is ok to use as the value of _HID, which I'll hopefully get
> > >>>sorted out with the kernel crew...
> > >>>
> > >>>>New since v1:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>        - expose control register size (suggested by Marc MarĂ­)
> > >>>>
> > >>>>        - leaving out _UID and _STA fields (thanks Shannon & Igor)
> > >>>>
> > >>>>        - using "QEMU0002" as the value of _HID (thanks Michael)
> > >>>>
> > >>>>        - added documentation blurb to docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt
> > >>>>          (mainly to record usage of the "QEMU0002" string with fw_cfg).
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> This series adds a fw_cfg device node to the SSDT (on pc), or to the
> > >>>>> DSDT (on arm).
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>       - Patch 1/3 moves (and renames) the BIOS_CFG_IOPORT (0x510)
> > >>>>>         define from pc.c to pc.h, so that it could be used from
> > >>>>>         acpi-build.c in patch 2/3.
> > >>>>> 
> > >>>>>       - Patch 2/3 adds a fw_cfg node to the pc SSDT.
> > >>>>> 
> > >>>>>       - Patch 3/3 adds a fw_cfg node to the arm DSDT.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I made up some names - "FWCF" for the node name, and "FWCF0001"
> > >>>>> for _HID; no idea whether that's appropriate, or how else I should
> > >>>>> figure out what to use instead...
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Also, using scope "\\_SB", based on where fw_cfg shows up in the
> > >>>>> output of "info qtree". Again, if that's wrong, please point me in
> > >>>>> the right direction.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Re. 3/3 (also mentioned after the commit blurb in the patch itself),
> > >>>>> I noticed none of the other DSDT entries contain a _STA field, 
> > >>>>> wondering
> > >>>>> why it would (not) make sense to include that, same as on the PC.
> > 
> > Gabriel L. Somlo (5):
> >   fw_cfg: expose control register size in fw_cfg.h
> >   pc: fw_cfg: move ioport base constant to pc.h
> >   acpi: pc: add fw_cfg device node to ssdt
> >   acpi: arm: add fw_cfg device node to dsdt
> >   fw_cfg: document ACPI device node information
> > 
> >  docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt     |  9 +++++++++
> >  hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c  | 15 +++++++++++++++
> >  hw/i386/acpi-build.c      | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  hw/i386/pc.c              |  5 ++---
> >  hw/nvram/fw_cfg.c         |  4 +++-
> >  include/hw/i386/pc.h      |  2 ++
> >  include/hw/nvram/fw_cfg.h |  3 +++
> >  7 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > -- 
> > 2.4.3
> > 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]