qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH COLO-Frame v11 23/39] COLO: Implement failover w


From: Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH COLO-Frame v11 23/39] COLO: Implement failover work for Primary VM
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 18:34:57 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

* zhanghailiang (address@hidden) wrote:
> For PVM, if there is failover request from users.
> The colo thread will exit the loop while the failover BH does the
> cleanup work and resumes VM.
> 
> Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <address@hidden>
> ---
> v11:
> - Don't call migration_end() in primary_vm_do_failover(),
>  The cleanup work will be done in migration_thread().
> - Remove vm_start() in primary_vm_do_failover() which also been done
>   in migraiton_thread()
> v10:
> - Call migration_end() in primary_vm_do_failover()
> ---
>  include/migration/colo.h     |  3 +++
>  include/migration/failover.h |  1 +
>  migration/colo-failover.c    |  7 +++++-
>  migration/colo.c             | 56 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  4 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/migration/colo.h b/include/migration/colo.h
> index ba27719..0b02e95 100644
> --- a/include/migration/colo.h
> +++ b/include/migration/colo.h
> @@ -32,4 +32,7 @@ void *colo_process_incoming_thread(void *opaque);
>  bool migration_incoming_in_colo_state(void);
>  
>  COLOMode get_colo_mode(void);
> +
> +/* failover */
> +void colo_do_failover(MigrationState *s);
>  #endif
> diff --git a/include/migration/failover.h b/include/migration/failover.h
> index 882c625..fba3931 100644
> --- a/include/migration/failover.h
> +++ b/include/migration/failover.h
> @@ -26,5 +26,6 @@ void failover_init_state(void);
>  int failover_set_state(int old_state, int new_state);
>  int failover_get_state(void);
>  void failover_request_active(Error **errp);
> +bool failover_request_is_active(void);
>  
>  #endif
> diff --git a/migration/colo-failover.c b/migration/colo-failover.c
> index 1b1be24..0c525da 100644
> --- a/migration/colo-failover.c
> +++ b/migration/colo-failover.c
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static void colo_failover_bh(void *opaque)
>          error_report("Unkown error for failover, old_state=%d", old_state);
>          return;
>      }
> -    /*TODO: Do failover work */
> +    colo_do_failover(NULL);
>  }
>  
>  void failover_request_active(Error **errp)
> @@ -67,6 +67,11 @@ int failover_get_state(void)
>      return atomic_read(&failover_state);
>  }
>  
> +bool failover_request_is_active(void)
> +{
> +    return ((failover_get_state() != FAILOVER_STATUS_NONE));
> +}
> +
>  void qmp_x_colo_lost_heartbeat(Error **errp)
>  {
>      if (get_colo_mode() == COLO_MODE_UNKNOWN) {
> diff --git a/migration/colo.c b/migration/colo.c
> index cedfc63..7a42fc6 100644
> --- a/migration/colo.c
> +++ b/migration/colo.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,42 @@ bool migration_incoming_in_colo_state(void)
>      return mis && (mis->state == MIGRATION_STATUS_COLO);
>  }
>  
> +static bool colo_runstate_is_stopped(void)
> +{
> +    return runstate_check(RUN_STATE_COLO) || !runstate_is_running();
> +}
> +
> +static void primary_vm_do_failover(void)
> +{
> +    MigrationState *s = migrate_get_current();
> +    int old_state;
> +
> +    if (s->state != MIGRATION_STATUS_FAILED) {
> +        migrate_set_state(&s->state, MIGRATION_STATUS_COLO,
> +                          MIGRATION_STATUS_COMPLETED);
> +    }

That's a little odd; it will only move to completed if the current
state is MIGRATION_STATUS_COLO, but you only do it if the state isn't
FAILED.  You could remove the if and just call migrate_set_state
like that and it would be safe as long as you really only expect
to have to deal with MIGRATION_STATUS_COLO.

> +    old_state = failover_set_state(FAILOVER_STATUS_HANDLING,
> +                                   FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED);
> +    if (old_state != FAILOVER_STATUS_HANDLING) {
> +        error_report("Serious error while do failover for Primary VM,"
> +                     "old_state: %d", old_state);

It's generally better to state the reason rather than say it's 'serious';
so something like:
   'Incorrect state (%d) while doing failover for Primary VM'
tells you more, and looks less scary!

> +        return;
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +void colo_do_failover(MigrationState *s)
> +{
> +    /* Make sure vm stopped while failover */
> +    if (!colo_runstate_is_stopped()) {
> +        vm_stop_force_state(RUN_STATE_COLO);
> +    }

That feels like a race? couldn't we be just at the end
of taking a checkpoint and about to restart when you do
the if, so it reads that it's currently stopped but
then it restarts it by the time you have a chance to
do anything?
I see in patch 13 (Save PVM....) you have:
     qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
     vm_start();
     qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();

So maybe if that code is executed just before the
failover, then it would stop at the _lock_, we would
run here but then as soon as we finish wouldn't it vm_start
there?

> +    if (get_colo_mode() == COLO_MODE_PRIMARY) {
> +        primary_vm_do_failover();
> +    }
> +}
> +
>  /* colo checkpoint control helper */
>  static int colo_ctl_put(QEMUFile *f, uint32_t cmd, uint64_t value)
>  {
> @@ -122,9 +158,22 @@ static int colo_do_checkpoint_transaction(MigrationState 
> *s,
>      }
>  
>      qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
> +    if (failover_request_is_active()) {
> +        qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
> +        ret = -1;
> +        goto out;
> +    }
>      vm_stop_force_state(RUN_STATE_COLO);
>      qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
>      trace_colo_vm_state_change("run", "stop");
> +    /*
> +     * failover request bh could be called after
> +     * vm_stop_force_state so we check failover_request_is_active() again.
> +     */
> +    if (failover_request_is_active()) {
> +        ret = -1;
> +        goto out;
> +    }

I'm confused about why the check is needed specifically here;
for example can't that happen at any point where we're ousite of the
iothread lock?  e.g. couldn't we set failover just a couple of
lines lower, lets say just after the s->params.blk= 0 ?

>      /* Disable block migration */
>      s->params.blk = 0;
> @@ -221,6 +270,11 @@ static void colo_process_checkpoint(MigrationState *s)
>      trace_colo_vm_state_change("stop", "run");
>  
>      while (s->state == MIGRATION_STATUS_COLO) {
> +        if (failover_request_is_active()) {
> +            error_report("failover request");
> +            goto out;
> +        }
> +
>          current_time = qemu_clock_get_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_HOST);
>          if (current_time - checkpoint_time <
>              s->parameters[MIGRATION_PARAMETER_CHECKPOINT_DELAY]) {
> @@ -242,8 +296,6 @@ out:
>      if (ret < 0) {
>          error_report("%s: %s", __func__, strerror(-ret));
>      }
> -    migrate_set_state(&s->state, MIGRATION_STATUS_COLO,
> -                      MIGRATION_STATUS_COMPLETED);

I had to think about this; but yes, I guess the only way out is via the failover
which does the completed above.

Dave

>      qsb_free(buffer);
>      buffer = NULL;
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 
> 
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / address@hidden / Manchester, UK



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]