Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [RFC] transactions: add transaction-wide property

[John Snow]

On 10/16/2015 08:23 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:50:20PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
>> Ping -- any consensus on how we should implement the "do-or-die"
>> argument for transactions that start block jobs? :)
>>
>> This patch may look a little hokey in how it boxes arguments, but I can
>> re-do it on top of Eric Blake's very official way of boxing arguments,
>> when the QAPI dust settles.
> 
> I don't understand what you are trying to do after staring at the email
> for 5 minutes.  Maybe the other reviewers hit the same problem and
> haven't responded.
> 
> What is the problem you're trying to solve?
> 
> Stefan
> 

Sorry...

What I am trying to do is to add the transactional blocker property to
the *transaction* command and not as an argument to each individual action.

There was some discussion on this so I wanted to just send an RFC to
show what I had in mind.

This series applies on top of Fam's latest series and moves the
arguments from each action to a transaction-wide property.