qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/arm/virt: Allow zero address for PCI IO spac


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/arm/virt: Allow zero address for PCI IO space
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:55:30 +0100

On 13 October 2015 at 14:25, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 13 October 2015 at 14:19, Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 02:12:34PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> Well, if we're going to go around and fix the machines which
>>> don't get things right, I guess. It's a shame the default for
>>> the global is "this machine is broken", because now every
>>> new machine will default unnecessarily to broken, and there's
>>> no way to grep the source tree for machines which need fixing.
>
>> It'd be easy enough to revert the logic if someone's willing to start on
>> this.  I'm reluctant to make this patchset depend on changing all
>> machines, but if you think I'm wrong, pls let me know.
>
> Most machines don't have a PCI controller, luckily.
> I'll have a look at how many files it would touch...

So, first up I'm happy that the gpex and versatile
pci controllers don't have this problem (the way they
set up the mmio and io windows means there won't be
overlaps). That leaves the following pci controllers,
which I've listed with the source files which define machines
that use them:

hw/pci-host/pbm
 hw/sparc64/sun4u.c
hw/pci-host/bonito
 hw/mips/mips_fulong2e.c
hw/pci-host/grackle
 hw/pc/mac_oldworld.c
hw/pci-host/piix
 [the x86 systems]
hw/pci-host/ppce500
 hw/ppc/e500.c
hw/pci-host/prep
 hw/ppc/prep.c
hw/pci-host/q35
 [x86 systems]
hw/pci-host/uninorth
 hw/ppc/mac_newworld.c
hw/alpha/typhoon
 used in hw/alpha/dp264.c
hw/mips/gt64xxx_pci
 hw/mips/mips_malta.c
hw/ppc/ppc4xx_pci
 hw/ppc/ppc440_bamboo.c
hw/ppc/spapr_pci
 hw/ppc/spapr.c [already marked as '0 addrs ok']
hw/s390/s390-pci-bus
 hw/s390/s390-virtio-ccw.c
hw/sh4/sh_pci
 hw/sh4/rd2.c

So we'd need to touch perhaps fifteen files in total.

I don't insist we do that rather than applying this particular
patch, but I don't think it's a huge effort.

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]