[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] Disas QOMification, round 2
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] Disas QOMification, round 2 |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 17:22:16 +0100 |
On 28 August 2015 at 17:19, Peter Crosthwaite
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Longer term though, maybe these homogeneous every-arch change patterns
> should only need a critical mass of acks from the arch maintainers for
> the whole thing to go through. It's unlikely that I botched moxie with
> most of the other arches reviewed, so chasing that ack from the last
> maintainer might not be needed. That or a generic reviewer should be
> able to ack ones like this, and it's almost candidate for trivial.
I think that's reasonable. I don't have a great deal of sympathy
if the minor architectures break if they don't have maintainers
who are willing to actually stick around on qemu-devel and
review changes to their code, rather than just dumping a patchset
on us and vanishing.
-- PMM
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] Disas QOMification, round 2, Peter Crosthwaite, 2015/08/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] Disas QOMification, round 2, Andreas Färber, 2015/08/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] Disas QOMification, round 2, Richard Henderson, 2015/08/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] Disas QOMification, round 2, Andreas Färber, 2015/08/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] Disas QOMification, round 2, Peter Maydell, 2015/08/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] Disas QOMification, round 2, Peter Crosthwaite, 2015/08/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] Disas QOMification, round 2,
Peter Maydell <=