qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] "iothread: release iothread around aio_poll" causes ran


From: Fam Zheng
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] "iothread: release iothread around aio_poll" causes random hangs at startup
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 17:34:08 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

On Wed, 06/10 11:18, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am 10.06.2015 um 04:12 schrieb Fam Zheng:
> > On Tue, 06/09 11:01, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >> Am 09.06.2015 um 04:28 schrieb Fam Zheng:
> >>> On Tue, 06/02 16:36, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >>>> Paolo,
> >>>>
> >>>> I bisected 
> >>>> commit a0710f7995f914e3044e5899bd8ff6c43c62f916
> >>>> Author:     Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> >>>> AuthorDate: Fri Feb 20 17:26:52 2015 +0100
> >>>> Commit:     Kevin Wolf <address@hidden>
> >>>> CommitDate: Tue Apr 28 15:36:08 2015 +0200
> >>>>
> >>>>     iothread: release iothread around aio_poll
> >>>>
> >>>> to cause a problem with hanging guests.
> >>>>
> >>>> Having many guests all with a kernel/ramdisk (via -kernel) and
> >>>> several null block devices will result in hangs. All hanging 
> >>>> guests are in partition detection code waiting for an I/O to return
> >>>> so very early maybe even the first I/O.
> >>>>
> >>>> Reverting that commit "fixes" the hangs.
> >>>> Any ideas?
> >>>
> >>> Christian, I can't reproduce this on my x86 box with virtio-blk-pci. Do 
> >>> you
> >>> have a reproducer for x86? Or could you collect backtraces for all the 
> >>> threads
> >>> in QEMU when it hangs?
> >>>
> >>> My long shot is that the main loop is blocked at aio_context_acquire(ctx),
> >>> while the iothread of that ctx is blocked at aio_poll(ctx, blocking).
> >>
> >> Here is a backtrace on s390. I need 2 or more disks, (one is not enough).
> > 
> > It shows iothreads and main loop are all waiting for events, and the vcpu
> > threads are running guest code.
> > 
> > It could be the requests being leaked. Do you see this problem with a 
> > regular
> > file based image or null-co driver? Maybe we're missing something about the
> > AioContext in block/null.c.
> 
> It seems to run with normal file based images. As soon as I have two or more 
> null-aio
> devices it hangs pretty soon when doing a reboot loop.
> 

Ahh! If it's a reboot loop, the device reset thing may get fishy. I suspect the
completion BH used by null-aio may be messed up, that's why I wonder whether
null-co:// would work for you. Could you test that?

Also, could you try below patch with null-aio://, too?

Thanks,
Fam

---

diff --git a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
index cd539aa..c87b444 100644
--- a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
+++ b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
@@ -652,15 +652,11 @@ static void virtio_blk_reset(VirtIODevice *vdev)
 {
     VirtIOBlock *s = VIRTIO_BLK(vdev);
 
-    if (s->dataplane) {
-        virtio_blk_data_plane_stop(s->dataplane);
-    }
-
-    /*
-     * This should cancel pending requests, but can't do nicely until there
-     * are per-device request lists.
-     */
     blk_drain_all();
+    if (s->dataplane) {
+        virtio_blk_data_plane_stop(s->dataplane);
+    }
+
     blk_set_enable_write_cache(s->blk, s->original_wce);
 }



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]