[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1458239] Re: Use qed instead of qcow2 for "-snapshot"
From: |
Michael Tokarev |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1458239] Re: Use qed instead of qcow2 for "-snapshot" functionality |
Date: |
Sun, 24 May 2015 07:26:13 -0000 |
I'm not sure I follow, why qed is better? qed was an example/testing
format in an attempt to make qcow2 faster. It succeeded in its task,
and qcow2 has been improved a lot after playing with qed. What's wrong
with qcow2 and why it is faster? How about providing some benchmarks?
** Changed in: qemu
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1458239
Title:
Use qed instead of qcow2 for "-snapshot" functionality
Status in QEMU:
Invalid
Bug description:
AFAIK, qed is better in performance than qcow2, so why we still use
qcow2 for internal snapshots ? patch is trivial.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1458239/+subscriptions
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |