qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 05/22] hw/acpi/aml-build: Add aml_interrupt()


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 05/22] hw/acpi/aml-build: Add aml_interrupt() term
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 12:33:25 +0200

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:05:49PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> On 2015/5/15 20:14, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 May 2015 16:51:31 +0100
> > Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
> > 
> >> > On 7 May 2015 at 10:29, Shannon Zhao <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>> > > From: Shannon Zhao <address@hidden>
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Add aml_interrupt() for describing device interrupt in resource 
> >>> > > template.
> >>> > > These can be used to generating DSDT table for ACPI on ARM.
> >> > 
> >>> > > +    /* Interrupt Number */
> >>> > > +    build_append_byte(var->buf, extract32(irq, 0, 8)); /* bits[7:0] 
> >>> > > */
> >>> > > +    build_append_byte(var->buf, extract32(irq, 8, 8)); /* bits[15:8] 
> >>> > > */
> >>> > > +    build_append_byte(var->buf, extract32(irq, 16, 8)); /* 
> >>> > > bits[23:16] */
> >>> > > +    build_append_byte(var->buf, extract32(irq, 24, 8)); /* 
> >>> > > bits[31:24] */
> >> > 
> >> > You used this twice in the previous patch and again here. Can
> >> > we factor it out so we can
> >> >   build_append_uint32(var->buf, irq);
> > I'd prefer to leave it as it is now, yes it's a bit of code duplication
> > but when you compare to spec it's 1:1 match and easy to compare
> > 
> 
> I think we could use build_append_uint32 because this really makes the
> code cleaner and it also matches the spec. When comparing to the spec,
> uint32 means 4 bytes, so it implies that it includes this byte and next
> 3 bytes and it also says the 4 bytes are integral.

To me it doesn't, build_append_uint32 suggests integer encoding
is used which is not the case here.  build_append_4byte?

> -- 
> Shannon



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]