|
| From: | Peter Maydell |
| Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 9/9] target-arm: Add WFx instruction trap support |
| Date: | Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:28:43 +0100 |
On 23 April 2015 at 12:24, Edgar E. Iglesias <address@hidden> wrote: > Maybe we can consider YIELD instead of NOP when has_work() is true as a WFI > is probably a good hint from guests to reschedule QEMU CPUs. That I'm not convinced about. If we have a pending interrupt then our best bet is probably to take it immediately on this CPU, not yield to another CPU and take the interrupt when we eventually get control back. -- PMM
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |