qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qemu v5 06/12] vfio: spapr: Add SPAPR IOMMU v2 s


From: Alexey Kardashevskiy
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qemu v5 06/12] vfio: spapr: Add SPAPR IOMMU v2 support (DMA memory preregistering)
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 14:05:28 +1000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0

On 04/08/2015 12:15 PM, David Gibson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 04:28:41PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
This makes use of the new "memory registering" feature. The idea is
to provide the guest ability to notify the host kernel about pages which

AFAICT it's not really the guest informing the host, just qemu
informing the host.  If I'm reading the code correctly, qemu registers
all RAM regionns, without guest intervention.

Right. Wrong commit log, I'll fix it.


are going to be used for DMA. Having this information, the host kernel
can pin them all once per user process, do locked pages accounting (once)
and not spent time on doing that in real time with possible failures
which cannot be handled nicely in some cases.

This adds a guest RAM memory listener which notifies a VFIO container
about memory which needs to be pinned/unpinned. VFIO MMIO regions
(i.e. "skip dump" regions) are skipped.

The feature is only enabled for SPAPR IOMMU v2. The host kernel changes
are required. Since v2 does not need/support VFIO_IOMMU_ENABLE, this does
not call it when v2 is detected and enabled.

So I'm clear, the v2 just represents a new userspace<->host kernel
interface for controlling the IOMMU, doesn't it?  It doesn't change
the guest visible IOMMU interface and doesn't represent different
IOMMU hardware?


Exactly true.


Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden>
---
Changes:
v5:
* simplified the patch
* added trace points
* added round_up() for the size
* SPAPR IOMMU v2 used
---
  hw/vfio/common.c              | 26 +++++++++-----
  hw/vfio/spapr.c               | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
  include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h |  5 ++-
  trace-events                  |  1 +
  4 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/vfio/common.c b/hw/vfio/common.c
index a71f881..e35e478 100644
--- a/hw/vfio/common.c
+++ b/hw/vfio/common.c
@@ -577,14 +577,18 @@ static int vfio_connect_container(VFIOGroup *group, 
AddressSpace *as)

          container->iommu_data.type1.initialized = true;

-    } else if (ioctl(fd, VFIO_CHECK_EXTENSION, VFIO_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU)) {
+    } else if (ioctl(fd, VFIO_CHECK_EXTENSION, VFIO_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU) ||
+               ioctl(fd, VFIO_CHECK_EXTENSION, VFIO_SPAPR_TCE_v2_IOMMU)) {
+        bool v2 = !!ioctl(fd, VFIO_CHECK_EXTENSION, VFIO_SPAPR_TCE_v2_IOMMU);
+
          ret = ioctl(group->fd, VFIO_GROUP_SET_CONTAINER, &fd);
          if (ret) {
              error_report("vfio: failed to set group container: %m");
              ret = -errno;
              goto free_container_exit;
          }
-        ret = ioctl(fd, VFIO_SET_IOMMU, VFIO_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU);
+        ret = ioctl(fd, VFIO_SET_IOMMU,
+                v2 ? VFIO_SPAPR_TCE_v2_IOMMU : VFIO_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU);
          if (ret) {
              error_report("vfio: failed to set iommu for container: %m");
              ret = -errno;
@@ -596,14 +600,20 @@ static int vfio_connect_container(VFIOGroup *group, 
AddressSpace *as)
           * when container fd is closed so we do not call it explicitly
           * in this file.
           */
-        ret = ioctl(fd, VFIO_IOMMU_ENABLE);
-        if (ret) {
-            error_report("vfio: failed to enable container: %m");
-            ret = -errno;
-            goto free_container_exit;
+        if (!v2) {
+            ret = ioctl(fd, VFIO_IOMMU_ENABLE);
+            if (ret) {
+                error_report("vfio: failed to enable container: %m");
+                ret = -errno;
+                goto free_container_exit;
+            }
          }

-        spapr_memory_listener_register(container);
+        ret = spapr_memory_listener_register(container, v2 ? 2 : 1);
+        if (ret) {
+            error_report("vfio: RAM memory listener initialization failed for 
container");
+            goto listener_release_exit;
+        }

      } else {
          error_report("vfio: No available IOMMU models");
diff --git a/hw/vfio/spapr.c b/hw/vfio/spapr.c
index 5f79194..a670907 100644
--- a/hw/vfio/spapr.c
+++ b/hw/vfio/spapr.c
@@ -17,6 +17,9 @@
   *  along with this program; if not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
   */

+#include <sys/ioctl.h>
+#include <linux/vfio.h>
+
  #include "hw/vfio/vfio-common.h"
  #include "qemu/error-report.h"
  #include "trace.h"
@@ -211,16 +214,88 @@ static const MemoryListener vfio_spapr_memory_listener = {
      .region_del = vfio_spapr_listener_region_del,
  };

+static void vfio_ram_do_region(VFIOContainer *container,
+                              MemoryRegionSection *section, unsigned long req)
+{
+    int ret;
+    struct vfio_iommu_spapr_register_memory reg = { .argsz = sizeof(reg) };
+
+    if (!memory_region_is_ram(section->mr) ||
+        memory_region_is_skip_dump(section->mr)) {
+        return;
+    }
+
+    reg.vaddr = (__u64) memory_region_get_ram_ptr(section->mr) +
+        section->offset_within_region;

Is section->offset_within_region always page aligned?


I think so as it is RAM. qemu_ram_alloc_from_file() and qemu_ram_alloc_internal() (called from memory_region_init_ram()) align.


+    reg.size = ROUND_UP(int128_get64(section->size), TARGET_PAGE_SIZE);
+
+    ret = ioctl(container->fd, req, &reg);
+    trace_vfio_ram_register(_IOC_NR(req) - VFIO_BASE, reg.vaddr, reg.size, 
ret);
+
+    /*
+     * On the initfn path, store the first error in the container so we
+     * can gracefully fail.  Runtime, there's not much we can do other
+     * than throw a hardware error.
+     */
+    if (!container->iommu_data.spapr.ram_reg_initialized) {
+        if (!container->iommu_data.spapr.ram_reg_error) {
+            container->iommu_data.spapr.ram_reg_error = ret;
+        }

This is pretty clunky, but I don't immediately see a better way.

Also.. won't the return value of ioctl() just be -1 on error, which
won't tell you much.  Do you want to store errno, instead?

Yes, I do, I'll fix it. Thanks.


+    } else {
+        hw_error("vfio: RAM registering failed, unable to continue");
+    }
+}
+
+static void vfio_spapr_ram_listener_region_add(MemoryListener *listener,
+                                               MemoryRegionSection *section)
+{
+    VFIOContainer *container = container_of(listener, VFIOContainer,
+                                            iommu_data.spapr.ramlistener);
+    memory_region_ref(section->mr);
+    vfio_ram_do_region(container, section, VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_REGISTER_MEMORY);
+}
+
+static void vfio_spapr_ram_listener_region_del(MemoryListener *listener,
+                                               MemoryRegionSection *section)
+{
+    VFIOContainer *container = container_of(listener, VFIOContainer,
+                                            iommu_data.spapr.ramlistener);
+    memory_region_unref(section->mr);
+    vfio_ram_do_region(container, section, VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_UNREGISTER_MEMORY);
+}
+
+static const MemoryListener vfio_spapr_ram_memory_listener = {
+    .region_add = vfio_spapr_ram_listener_region_add,
+    .region_del = vfio_spapr_ram_listener_region_del,
+};
+
  static void vfio_spapr_listener_release(VFIOContainer *container)
  {
      memory_listener_unregister(&container->iommu_data.spapr.listener);
  }

-void spapr_memory_listener_register(VFIOContainer *container)
+static void vfio_spapr_listener_release_v2(VFIOContainer *container)
+{
+    memory_listener_unregister(&container->iommu_data.spapr.listener);
+    vfio_spapr_listener_release(container);
+}
+
+int spapr_memory_listener_register(VFIOContainer *container, int ver)
  {
      container->iommu_data.spapr.listener = vfio_spapr_memory_listener;
      container->iommu_data.release = vfio_spapr_listener_release;
-
      memory_listener_register(&container->iommu_data.spapr.listener,
                               container->space->as);
+    if (ver < 2) {
+        return 0;
+    }
+
+    container->iommu_data.spapr.ramlistener = vfio_spapr_ram_memory_listener;
+    container->iommu_data.release = vfio_spapr_listener_release_v2;
+    memory_listener_register(&container->iommu_data.spapr.ramlistener,
+                             &address_space_memory);
+
+    container->iommu_data.spapr.ram_reg_initialized = true;
+
+    return container->iommu_data.spapr.ram_reg_error;
  }
diff --git a/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h b/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h
index d0b831c..b5ef446 100644
--- a/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h
+++ b/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h
@@ -71,6 +71,9 @@ typedef struct VFIOType1 {

  typedef struct VFIOSPAPR {
      MemoryListener listener;
+    MemoryListener ramlistener;
+    int ram_reg_error;
+    bool ram_reg_initialized;
  } VFIOSPAPR;

  typedef struct VFIOContainer {
@@ -156,6 +159,6 @@ extern int vfio_dma_unmap(VFIOContainer *container,
                            hwaddr iova, ram_addr_t size);
  bool vfio_listener_skipped_section(MemoryRegionSection *section);

-extern void spapr_memory_listener_register(VFIOContainer *container);
+extern int spapr_memory_listener_register(VFIOContainer *container, int ver);

  #endif /* !HW_VFIO_VFIO_COMMON_H */
diff --git a/trace-events b/trace-events
index 1231ba4..2739140 100644
--- a/trace-events
+++ b/trace-events
@@ -1563,6 +1563,7 @@ vfio_disconnect_container(int fd) "close container->fd=%d"
  vfio_put_group(int fd) "close group->fd=%d"
  vfio_get_device(const char * name, unsigned int flags, unsigned int num_regions, 
unsigned int num_irqs) "Device %s flags: %u, regions: %u, irqs: %u"
  vfio_put_base_device(int fd) "close vdev->fd=%d"
+vfio_ram_register(int req, uint64_t va, uint64_t size, int ret) "req=%d va=%"PRIx64" 
size=%"PRIx64" ret=%d"

  #hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c
  mhp_acpi_invalid_slot_selected(uint32_t slot) "0x%"PRIx32



--
Alexey



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]