qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] rcutorture: fix compilation on 32-bit ppc


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] rcutorture: fix compilation on 32-bit ppc
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 16:34:51 +0100

32-bit PPC cannot do atomic operations on long long.  Inside the loops,
we are already using local counters that are summed at the end of
the run---with one exception in rcu_read_stress_test: fix it to use
the same technique.  Then, use a mutex to protect the global counts.
Performance does not matter there because every thread will only enter
the critical section once.

Remaining uses of atomic instructions are for ints or pointers.

Reported-by: Andreas Faerber <address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
---
 tests/rcutorture.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/rcutorture.c b/tests/rcutorture.c
index 60a2ccf..d6b304d 100644
--- a/tests/rcutorture.c
+++ b/tests/rcutorture.c
@@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ static volatile int goflag = GOFLAG_INIT;
 #define RCU_READ_RUN 1000
 
 #define NR_THREADS 100
+static QemuMutex counts_mutex;
 static QemuThread threads[NR_THREADS];
 static struct rcu_reader_data *data[NR_THREADS];
 static int n_threads;
@@ -130,7 +131,9 @@ static void *rcu_read_perf_test(void *arg)
         }
         n_reads_local += RCU_READ_RUN;
     }
-    atomic_add(&n_reads, n_reads_local);
+    qemu_mutex_lock(&counts_mutex);
+    n_reads += n_reads_local;
+    qemu_mutex_unlock(&counts_mutex);
 
     rcu_unregister_thread();
     return NULL;
@@ -151,7 +154,9 @@ static void *rcu_update_perf_test(void *arg)
         synchronize_rcu();
         n_updates_local++;
     }
-    atomic_add(&n_updates, n_updates_local);
+    qemu_mutex_lock(&counts_mutex);
+    n_updates += n_updates_local;
+    qemu_mutex_unlock(&counts_mutex);
 
     rcu_unregister_thread();
     return NULL;
@@ -241,6 +246,7 @@ static void *rcu_read_stress_test(void *arg)
     struct rcu_stress *p;
     int pc;
     long long n_reads_local = 0;
+    long long rcu_stress_local[RCU_STRESS_PIPE_LEN + 1] = { 0 };
     volatile int garbage = 0;
 
     rcu_register_thread();
@@ -265,13 +271,18 @@ static void *rcu_read_stress_test(void *arg)
         if ((pc > RCU_STRESS_PIPE_LEN) || (pc < 0)) {
             pc = RCU_STRESS_PIPE_LEN;
         }
-        atomic_inc(&rcu_stress_count[pc]);
+        rcu_stress_local[pc]++;
         n_reads_local++;
         if ((++itercnt % 0x1000) == 0) {
             synchronize_rcu();
         }
     }
-    atomic_add(&n_reads, n_reads_local);
+    qemu_mutex_lock(&counts_mutex);
+    n_reads += n_reads_local;
+    for (i = 0; i <= RCU_STRESS_PIPE_LEN; i++) {
+        rcu_stress_count[i] += rcu_stress_local[i];
+    }
+    qemu_mutex_unlock(&counts_mutex);
 
     rcu_unregister_thread();
     return NULL;
@@ -419,6 +430,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
     int nreaders = 1;
     int duration = 1;
 
+    qemu_mutex_init(&counts_mutex);
     if (argc >= 2 && argv[1][0] == '-') {
         g_test_init(&argc, &argv, NULL);
         if (g_test_quick()) {
-- 
2.3.0




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]