qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v3 09/14] iotests: maintain several vms in t


From: John Snow
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v3 09/14] iotests: maintain several vms in test
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 18:48:02 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0



On 02/18/2015 09:00 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
The only problem with it is the same qmp socket name (which is
vm._monitor_path) for all vms. And because of this second vm couldn't be
lauched (vm.launch() fails because of socket is already in use).
This patch adds a number of vm into vm._monitor_path

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <address@hidden>
---
  tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py | 6 ++++--
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py b/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py
index cf5faac..fa756b4 100644
--- a/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py
+++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py
@@ -77,16 +77,18 @@ def create_image(name, size):

  class VM(object):
      '''A QEMU VM'''
+    nb_vms = 0

      def __init__(self):
-        self._monitor_path = os.path.join(test_dir, 'qemu-mon.%d' % 
os.getpid())
-        self._qemu_log_path = os.path.join(test_dir, 'qemu-log.%d' % 
os.getpid())
+        self._monitor_path = os.path.join(test_dir, 'qemu-mon.%d.%d' % 
(os.getpid(), VM.nb_vms))
+        self._qemu_log_path = os.path.join(test_dir, 'qemu-log.%d.%d' % 
(os.getpid(), VM.nb_vms))
          self._args = qemu_args + ['-chardev',
                       'socket,id=mon,path=' + self._monitor_path,
                       '-mon', 'chardev=mon,mode=control',
                       '-qtest', 'stdio', '-machine', 'accel=qtest',
                       '-display', 'none', '-vga', 'none']
          self._num_drives = 0
+        VM.nb_vms += 1

      # This can be used to add an unused monitor instance.
      def add_monitor_telnet(self, ip, port):


Simple enough, thanks!

Reviewed-by: John Snow <address@hidden>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]