[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 2/8] vfio-pci: add aer capability support
From: |
Alex Williamson |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 2/8] vfio-pci: add aer capability support |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Feb 2015 06:43:03 -0700 |
On Fri, 2015-02-06 at 15:03 +0800, Chen Fan wrote:
> On 02/03/2015 04:15 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 16:37 +0800, Chen Fan wrote:
> >> if we detect the aer capability in vfio device, then
> >> we should initialize the vfio device aer rigister bits.
> >> so guest OS can set this bits as needed.
> > s/rigister/register/
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Chen Fan <address@hidden>
> >> ---
> >> hw/vfio/pci.c | 72
> >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> >> index 014a92c..2072261 100644
> >> --- a/hw/vfio/pci.c
> >> +++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> >> @@ -2670,6 +2670,73 @@ static int vfio_add_capabilities(VFIOPCIDevice
> >> *vdev)
> >> return vfio_add_std_cap(vdev, pdev->config[PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST]);
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static void vfio_pci_aer_init(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
> >> +{
> >> + PCIDevice *pdev = &vdev->pdev;
> >> + PCIExpressDevice *exp = &pdev->exp;
> >> + uint16_t offset = exp->aer_cap;
> >> +
> >> + if (!offset) {
> >> + return;
> >> + }
> >> +
> > All of these need to be documented with comments.
> >
> >> + memset(pdev->wmask + offset, 0, PCI_ERR_SIZEOF);
> >> + memset(pdev->w1cmask + offset, 0, PCI_ERR_SIZEOF);
> >> + memset(pdev->cmask + offset, 0xFF, PCI_ERR_SIZEOF);
> >> +
> >> + pci_long_test_and_set_mask(pdev->wmask + exp->exp_cap +
> >> PCI_EXP_DEVCTL,
> >> + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_CERE | PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_NFERE
> >> |
> >> + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_FERE | PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_URRE);
> >> + pci_long_test_and_set_mask(pdev->w1cmask + exp->exp_cap +
> >> PCI_EXP_DEVSTA,
> >> + PCI_EXP_DEVSTA_CED | PCI_EXP_DEVSTA_NFED |
> >> + PCI_EXP_DEVSTA_FED | PCI_EXP_DEVSTA_URD);
> >> +
> >> + pci_set_long(pdev->w1cmask + offset + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS,
> >> + PCI_ERR_UNC_SUPPORTED);
> >> + pci_set_long(pdev->wmask + offset + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_SEVER,
> >> + PCI_ERR_UNC_SUPPORTED);
> >> + pci_long_test_and_set_mask(pdev->w1cmask + offset +
> >> PCI_ERR_COR_STATUS,
> >> + PCI_ERR_COR_STATUS);
> >> + pci_set_long(pdev->wmask + offset + PCI_ERR_COR_MASK,
> >> + PCI_ERR_COR_SUPPORTED);
> >> +
> >> + pci_set_long(pdev->wmask + offset + PCI_ERR_CAP,
> >> + PCI_ERR_CAP_ECRC_GENE | PCI_ERR_CAP_ECRC_CHKE |
> >> + PCI_ERR_CAP_MHRE);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int vfio_add_ext_capabilities(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
> >> +{
> >> + PCIDevice *pdev = &vdev->pdev;
> >> + PCIExpressDevice *exp;
> >> + uint32_t header;
> >> + uint16_t next = PCI_CONFIG_SPACE_SIZE;
> >> +
> >> + if (pci_config_size(pdev) <= PCI_CONFIG_SPACE_SIZE) {
> >> + return 0;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + header = pci_get_long(pdev->config + next);
> >> + while (header) {
> >> + switch (PCI_EXT_CAP_ID(header)) {
> >> + case PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_ERR:
> >> + exp = &pdev->exp;
> >> + exp->aer_cap = next;
> > Shouldn't we call pcie_aer_init() here?
> I am afraid pcie_aer_init() maybe impact the corresponding values
> in pdev->config.
Then we should do cleanup after calling pcie_aer_init() or modify
pcie_aer_init() to do what we need. Doing raw aer manipulation outside
of core support just causes maintenance issues down the road. Thanks,
Alex
> >> +
> >> + vfio_pci_aer_init(vdev);
> >> + break;
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + next = PCI_EXT_CAP_NEXT(header);
> >> + if (!next) {
> >> + return 0;
> >> + }
> >> + header = pci_get_long(pdev->config + next);
> > I'd like to see this look more like vfio_add_std_cap(), registering
> > every capability with the QEMU PCIe-core and setting up emulation to
> > allow QEMU to skip capabilities that it doesn't want to expose.
> >
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> static void vfio_pci_pre_reset(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
> >> {
> >> PCIDevice *pdev = &vdev->pdev;
> >> @@ -3296,6 +3363,11 @@ static int vfio_initfn(PCIDevice *pdev)
> >> goto out_teardown;
> >> }
> >>
> >> + ret = vfio_add_ext_capabilities(vdev);
> >> + if (ret) {
> >> + goto out_teardown;
> >> + }
> >> +
> > Why not extend vfio_add_capabilities()? It specifically calls
> > vfio_add_std_cap() in order that there could be a vfio_add_ext_cap().
> it is a good idea.
>
> Thanks,
> Chen
>
>
> >
> >> /* QEMU emulates all of MSI & MSIX */
> >> if (pdev->cap_present & QEMU_PCI_CAP_MSIX) {
> >> memset(vdev->emulated_config_bits + pdev->msix_cap, 0xff,
> >
> >
> > .
> >
>