[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] hw/ppc/spapr.c Set default boot order
From: |
Markus Armbruster |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] hw/ppc/spapr.c Set default boot order |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:37:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Dinar Valeev <address@hidden> writes:
> On 01/26/2015 10:11 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> address@hidden writes:
>>
>>> From: Dinar Valeev <address@hidden>
>>>
>>> In order to use -boot once=X option we need to have default list
>>> where restore to on reset.
>>
>> Really? What happens without this patch?
>>
> qemu segfaults on reset.
> 0 > reset-all Segmentation fault
Next time, include a backtrace, please.
Here's what I think happens.
Boot order comes from --boot parameter once, order, or else the machine
type's .default_boot_order. The latter is null for you.
It gets passed via ppc_spapr_init() to spapr_create_fdt_skel(), which
sets qemu,boot-device in the FDT to it, but only when it isn't null.
If it comes from parameter once, we additionally register a reset
handler to switch it to parameter order or else .default_boot_order on
reset. If you specify once, but not order, this is null for you.
On reset, reset handler restore_boot_order() runs. Unlike
spapr_create_fdt_skel(), it doesn't check for null, and crashes in
validate_bootdevices().
Correct?
For me, a null .default_boot_order means "machine type does not support
boot order" (this is how commit c165473 treats it). Arguably, --boot
order and once should be rejected then.
If I understand you correctly, your machine type does support boot
order. Giving it a non-null .default_boot_order makes sense then. The
appropriate value depends on firmware. It could even be "".
The null check in spapr_create_fdt_skel() looks superfluous then.
Consider dropping it.
Makes sense?