Re: [Qemu-devel] Can we make better use of Coverity?

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 21/01/2015 14:58, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Defect density by component, from
> https://scan.coverity.com/projects/378?tab=overview

Updated:

bt              4610    1.74    8
slirp           6968    1.44    10
9pfs            9493    1.37    13
user            32263   0.68    22
fpu             15355   0.59    9
(headers)       12323   0.57    7
mips            34321   0.52    18
net             27732   0.43    12
util            12668   0.39    5
lm32            2836    0.35    1
block           62844   0.35    22
ui              43828   0.34    15
ppc             49651   0.28    14
char            10703   0.28    3
disas           38362   0.26    10
i386            36786   0.22    8
migration       5249    0.19    1
usb             25647   0.19    5
m68k            5533    0.18    1
s390            17171   0.17    3
sparc           14788   0.14    2
tricore         7801    0.13    1
pci             11623   0.09    1
Other           297281  0.08    25
scsi            14521   0.07    1
audio           16304   0.06    1
arm             75435   0.03    2
Defect-free     93835   0.00    0
--------------------------------------------
Total           985931  0.22    220

Other is now smaller by 15%.  It will get even smaller as soon as the
list is refreshed: I've just created qemu-ga and xen components, as well
as moved more files out of Other (and into lm32, ppc and tcg).

Defect-free includes: alpha, cris, microblaze, openrisc, sh, unicore32,
xtensa, libcacard, monitor, nbd, tcg (though it will get a defect as
soon as the list is refreshed), trace.

There are a good number of subsystems that are really close to 0.

Paolo