[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layou
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Dec 2014 10:50:04 +0100 |
On Wed, 3 Dec 2014 10:27:36 +0100
Cornelia Huck <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 21:03:45 +0200
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 04:41:36PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > void virtio_queue_set_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int num)
> > > {
> > > + /*
> > > + * For virtio-1 devices, the number of buffers may only be
> > > + * updated if the ring addresses have not yet been set up.
> >
> > Where does it say that?
>
> Hmpf, may have imagined that.
>
> This means we either need to track whether used/avail have been
> specified or calculated or move responsibility for re-calculation of
> used/avail for the old layout into the callers.
What about this one instead?
diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c
index 43b7e02..1e2a720 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c
@@ -244,9 +244,13 @@ static void virtio_mmio_write(void *opaque, hwaddr offset,
uint64_t value,
case VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUENUM:
DPRINTF("mmio_queue write %d max %d\n", (int)value,
VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE);
virtio_queue_set_num(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, value);
+ /* Note: only call this function for legacy devices */
+ virtio_queue_update_rings(vdev, vdev->queue_sel);
break;
case VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUEALIGN:
+ /* Note: this is only valid for legacy devices */
virtio_queue_set_align(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, value);
+ virtio_queue_update_rings(vdev, vdev->queue_sel);
break;
case VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUEPFN:
if (value == 0) {
diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
index 8f69ffa..b2d553e 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/virtio.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
@@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ typedef struct VRing
struct VirtQueue
{
VRing vring;
- hwaddr pa;
uint16_t last_avail_idx;
/* Last used index value we have signalled on */
uint16_t signalled_used;
@@ -92,15 +91,18 @@ struct VirtQueue
};
/* virt queue functions */
-static void virtqueue_init(VirtQueue *vq)
+void virtio_queue_update_rings(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n)
{
- hwaddr pa = vq->pa;
+ VRing *vring = &vdev->vq[n].vring;
- vq->vring.desc = pa;
- vq->vring.avail = pa + vq->vring.num * sizeof(VRingDesc);
- vq->vring.used = vring_align(vq->vring.avail +
- offsetof(VRingAvail, ring[vq->vring.num]),
- vq->vring.align);
+ if (!vring->desc) {
+ /* not yet setup -> nothing to do */
+ return;
+ }
+ vring->avail = vring->desc + vring->num * sizeof(VRingDesc);
+ vring->used = vring_align(vring->avail +
+ offsetof(VRingAvail, ring[vring->num]),
+ vring->align);
}
static inline uint64_t vring_desc_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, hwaddr desc_pa,
@@ -605,7 +607,6 @@ void virtio_reset(void *opaque)
vdev->vq[i].vring.avail = 0;
vdev->vq[i].vring.used = 0;
vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx = 0;
- vdev->vq[i].pa = 0;
vdev->vq[i].vector = VIRTIO_NO_VECTOR;
vdev->vq[i].signalled_used = 0;
vdev->vq[i].signalled_used_valid = false;
@@ -708,13 +709,21 @@ void virtio_config_writel(VirtIODevice *vdev, uint32_t
addr, uint32_t data)
void virtio_queue_set_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, hwaddr addr)
{
- vdev->vq[n].pa = addr;
- virtqueue_init(&vdev->vq[n]);
+ vdev->vq[n].vring.desc = addr;
+ virtio_queue_update_rings(vdev, n);
}
hwaddr virtio_queue_get_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n)
{
- return vdev->vq[n].pa;
+ return vdev->vq[n].vring.desc;
+}
+
+void virtio_queue_set_rings(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, hwaddr desc,
+ hwaddr avail, hwaddr used)
+{
+ vdev->vq[n].vring.desc = desc;
+ vdev->vq[n].vring.avail = avail;
+ vdev->vq[n].vring.used = used;
}
void virtio_queue_set_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int num)
@@ -728,7 +737,6 @@ void virtio_queue_set_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int
num)
return;
}
vdev->vq[n].vring.num = num;
- virtqueue_init(&vdev->vq[n]);
}
int virtio_queue_get_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n)
@@ -748,6 +756,11 @@ void virtio_queue_set_align(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int
align)
BusState *qbus = qdev_get_parent_bus(DEVICE(vdev));
VirtioBusClass *k = VIRTIO_BUS_GET_CLASS(qbus);
+ /* virtio-1 compliant devices cannot change the aligment */
+ if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) {
+ error_report("tried to modify queue alignment for virtio-1 device");
+ return;
+ }
/* Check that the transport told us it was going to do this
* (so a buggy transport will immediately assert rather than
* silently failing to migrate this state)
@@ -755,7 +768,6 @@ void virtio_queue_set_align(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int
align)
assert(k->has_variable_vring_alignment);
vdev->vq[n].vring.align = align;
- virtqueue_init(&vdev->vq[n]);
}
void virtio_queue_notify_vq(VirtQueue *vq)
@@ -949,7 +961,8 @@ void virtio_save(VirtIODevice *vdev, QEMUFile *f)
if (k->has_variable_vring_alignment) {
qemu_put_be32(f, vdev->vq[i].vring.align);
}
- qemu_put_be64(f, vdev->vq[i].pa);
+ /* XXX virtio-1 devices */
+ qemu_put_be64(f, vdev->vq[i].vring.desc);
qemu_put_be16s(f, &vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx);
if (k->save_queue) {
k->save_queue(qbus->parent, i, f);
@@ -1044,13 +1057,14 @@ int virtio_load(VirtIODevice *vdev, QEMUFile *f, int
version_id)
if (k->has_variable_vring_alignment) {
vdev->vq[i].vring.align = qemu_get_be32(f);
}
- vdev->vq[i].pa = qemu_get_be64(f);
+ vdev->vq[i].vring.desc = qemu_get_be64(f);
qemu_get_be16s(f, &vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx);
vdev->vq[i].signalled_used_valid = false;
vdev->vq[i].notification = true;
- if (vdev->vq[i].pa) {
- virtqueue_init(&vdev->vq[i]);
+ if (vdev->vq[i].vring.desc) {
+ /* XXX virtio-1 devices */
+ virtio_queue_update_rings(vdev, i);
} else if (vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx) {
error_report("VQ %d address 0x0 "
"inconsistent with Host index 0x%x",
@@ -1084,7 +1098,7 @@ int virtio_load(VirtIODevice *vdev, QEMUFile *f, int
version_id)
}
for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
- if (vdev->vq[i].pa) {
+ if (vdev->vq[i].vring.desc) {
uint16_t nheads;
nheads = vring_avail_idx(&vdev->vq[i]) -
vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx;
/* Check it isn't doing strange things with descriptor numbers. */
diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
index 68c40db..b63ced3 100644
--- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
+++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
@@ -224,6 +224,9 @@ void virtio_queue_set_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n,
hwaddr addr);
hwaddr virtio_queue_get_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);
void virtio_queue_set_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int num);
int virtio_queue_get_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);
+void virtio_queue_set_rings(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, hwaddr desc,
+ hwaddr avail, hwaddr used);
+void virtio_queue_update_rings(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);
void virtio_queue_set_align(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int align);
void virtio_queue_notify(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);
uint16_t virtio_queue_vector(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 04/19] virtio: add feature checking helpers, (continued)
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 04/19] virtio: add feature checking helpers, Cornelia Huck, 2014/12/02
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 05/19] virtio: support more feature bits, Cornelia Huck, 2014/12/02
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 06/19] virtio: endianness checks for virtio 1.0 devices, Cornelia Huck, 2014/12/02
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout, Cornelia Huck, 2014/12/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2014/12/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout, Cornelia Huck, 2014/12/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout, Cornelia Huck, 2014/12/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2014/12/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout, Cornelia Huck, 2014/12/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout,
Cornelia Huck <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2014/12/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout, Cornelia Huck, 2014/12/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2014/12/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout, Cornelia Huck, 2014/12/03
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 08/19] dataplane: allow virtio-1 devices, Cornelia Huck, 2014/12/02
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 09/19] s390x/css: Add a callback for when subchannel gets disabled, Cornelia Huck, 2014/12/02
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 12/19] virtio: disallow late feature changes for virtio-1, Cornelia Huck, 2014/12/02
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 11/19] s390x/virtio-ccw: support virtio-1 set_vq format, Cornelia Huck, 2014/12/02
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 10/19] s390x/virtio-ccw: add virtio set-revision call, Cornelia Huck, 2014/12/02